CSR Input and Recycling Decisions for Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information

In reality, there is often information asymmetry between upstream and downstream enterprises in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) system, which can have a profound impact on the decisions of member enterprises and the operation of the system. Under asymmetric market demand information, this study examines CSR input and recycling decision making in CLSC. Four decision-making models were developed for CLSC, and the effects of consumer sensitivity to CSR input and demand information asymmetry on CLSC optimization were studied. The results indicate that higher consumer sensitivity to CSR input enhances both CSR levels and recycling rates, benefiting both manufacturer and retailer by increasing profits. In terms of increasing CSR levels, the manufacturer achieves the best results when independently managing CSR input and recycling. However, for improving recycling rates and market demand, the retailer is more effective when responsible for CSR input, with the manufacturer handling recycling. Additionally, demand information asymmetry reduces the manufacturer’s profit but may not affect the retailer’s profit. The retailer–manufacturer cooperation model proves more beneficial for overall CLSC system performance compared to information symmetry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13060432
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CSR Input and Recycling Decisions for Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information

Minghui Ni, Fengmin Yao, X. S. Qin, Wenbo Bo
3 citations
Systems
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
6.68
article

CSR Input and Recycling Decisions for Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Information

Minghui Ni, Fengmin Yao, X. S. Qin, Wenbo Bo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In reality, there is often information asymmetry between upstream and downstream enterprises in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) system, which can have a profound impact on the decisions of member enterprises and the operation of the system. Under asymmetric market demand information, this study examines CSR input and recycling decision making in CLSC. Four decision-making models were developed for CLSC, and the effects of consumer sensitivity to CSR input and demand information asymmetry on CLSC optimization were studied. The results indicate that higher consumer sensitivity to CSR input enhances both CSR levels and recycling rates, benefiting both manufacturer and retailer by increasing profits. In terms of increasing CSR levels, the manufacturer achieves the best results when independently managing CSR input and recycling. However, for improving recycling rates and market demand, the retailer is more effective when responsible for CSR input, with the manufacturer handling recycling. Additionally, demand information asymmetry reduces the manufacturer’s profit but may not affect the retailer’s profit. The retailer–manufacturer cooperation model proves more beneficial for overall CLSC system performance compared to information symmetry.

SystemsVol. 13(6)
Harbin University of Science and Technology (CN), Heilongjiang Institute of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.