Processing Factors and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Wine

The presence of pesticide residues in wine raises concerns about consumer health and regulatory compliance. This study evaluates the behaviour of seven pesticides (boscalid, penconazole, tebufenozide, kresoxim-methyl, trifloxystrobin, chlorpyrifos and lambda-cyhalothrin) during key stages of vinification, including clarification, fermentation, and racking, using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Penconazole, kresoxim-methyl and trifloxystrobin were not detected at the beginning of the vinification stage. Boscalid, chlorpyrifos and lambda-cyalothrin showed a reduction of 100% whit, a concentration below the limit of quantification at the end of the vinification stage. However, tebufenozide showed the lower elimination rate (88.1%), presenting a concentration at the end of the vinification process of 21.71 µg/kg. Experimental data confirm that pesticide concentrations progressively decline due to a combination of physicochemical transformations, adsorption onto solids, and biochemical processes. The clarification and racking stages are particularly important for reducing residues, primarily by removing suspended solids that adsorb pesticides. Fermentation also contributes to this reduction through microbial metabolism and enzymatic hydrolysis. The effectiveness of these stages depends on the pesticide’s solubility, chemical stability, and interactions with components in the wine matrix. Additionally, a risk assessment based on Acceptable Daily Intake and Estimated Daily Intake was performed to evaluate potential consumer exposure, showing lower risk for all pesticides studied. The findings emphasise the importance of optimising clarification and racking procedures, selecting effective fining agents, and refining filtration techniques to further enhance pesticide removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fermentation
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation11060318
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Processing Factors and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Wine

Pedro Andreo‐Martínez, S. Cermeño, José Manuel Veiga-del-Baño, José Oliva et al.
2 citations
Fermentation
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
2.32
article

Processing Factors and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Wine

Pedro Andreo‐Martínez, S. Cermeño, José Manuel Veiga-del-Baño, José Oliva, Miguel Ángel Cámara
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The presence of pesticide residues in wine raises concerns about consumer health and regulatory compliance. This study evaluates the behaviour of seven pesticides (boscalid, penconazole, tebufenozide, kresoxim-methyl, trifloxystrobin, chlorpyrifos and lambda-cyhalothrin) during key stages of vinification, including clarification, fermentation, and racking, using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Penconazole, kresoxim-methyl and trifloxystrobin were not detected at the beginning of the vinification stage. Boscalid, chlorpyrifos and lambda-cyalothrin showed a reduction of 100% whit, a concentration below the limit of quantification at the end of the vinification stage. However, tebufenozide showed the lower elimination rate (88.1%), presenting a concentration at the end of the vinification process of 21.71 µg/kg. Experimental data confirm that pesticide concentrations progressively decline due to a combination of physicochemical transformations, adsorption onto solids, and biochemical processes. The clarification and racking stages are particularly important for reducing residues, primarily by removing suspended solids that adsorb pesticides. Fermentation also contributes to this reduction through microbial metabolism and enzymatic hydrolysis. The effectiveness of these stages depends on the pesticide’s solubility, chemical stability, and interactions with components in the wine matrix. Additionally, a risk assessment based on Acceptable Daily Intake and Estimated Daily Intake was performed to evaluate potential consumer exposure, showing lower risk for all pesticides studied. The findings emphasise the importance of optimising clarification and racking procedures, selecting effective fining agents, and refining filtration techniques to further enhance pesticide removal.

FermentationVol. 11(6)
Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Fundación Séneca
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.