Comparison of Results of Standard Versus Accelerated Casting Method for Relapsed Club Foot Deformity

Relapsed idiopathic clubfoot remains a significant clinical challenge in pediatric orthopedics, particularly in low-resource countries like Pakistan. While the standard Ponseti method with weekly casting is well-established, the accelerated casting method, requiring more frequent cast changes, offers potential advantages in reducing treatment time without compromising outcomes. Objective: To compare the effectiveness, complication rates, recurrence, and parental satisfaction between standard weekly casting and accelerated bi-weekly casting methods for relapsed clubfoot deformity in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 15, 2024, to March 15, 2025. A total of 80 children with relapsed idiopathic clubfoot were divided into two equal groups: 40 treated with the standard Ponseti method and 40 with the accelerated method. Outcomes included a number of casts, treatment duration, Pirani score improvement, complication rates, recurrence at 6-month follow-up, and parental satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25.0, with independent t-tests and chi-square tests applied where appropriate. Results: Both groups achieved comparable deformity correction as reflected by similar final Pirani scores (0.7 ± 0.4 in standard vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 in accelerated, p = 0.312). The accelerated group required significantly fewer casts (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 6.9 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and shorter treatment duration (2.6 ± 0.5 weeks vs. 6.9 ± 1.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Complication and recurrence rates were low and statistically similar in both groups. Parental satisfaction was significantly higher in the accelerated group (mean score 4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The accelerated Ponseti method is a safe and effective alternative to standard casting for relapsed clubfoot, offering faster correction and higher caregiver satisfaction without increasing complications or recurrence. Its adoption may enhance compliance and reduce treatment burden in the Pakistani healthcare setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1715
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Results of Standard Versus Accelerated Casting Method for Relapsed Club Foot Deformity

Obaid ur Rahman, Mohammad Razi, Maira Bukhari, Usman Waleed et al.
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Comparison of Results of Standard Versus Accelerated Casting Method for Relapsed Club Foot Deformity

Obaid ur Rahman, Mohammad Razi, Maira Bukhari, Usman Waleed, Muhammad Rafiq, Muhammad Hassan Zafar
article en

Abstract

Relapsed idiopathic clubfoot remains a significant clinical challenge in pediatric orthopedics, particularly in low-resource countries like Pakistan. While the standard Ponseti method with weekly casting is well-established, the accelerated casting method, requiring more frequent cast changes, offers potential advantages in reducing treatment time without compromising outcomes. Objective: To compare the effectiveness, complication rates, recurrence, and parental satisfaction between standard weekly casting and accelerated bi-weekly casting methods for relapsed clubfoot deformity in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 15, 2024, to March 15, 2025. A total of 80 children with relapsed idiopathic clubfoot were divided into two equal groups: 40 treated with the standard Ponseti method and 40 with the accelerated method. Outcomes included a number of casts, treatment duration, Pirani score improvement, complication rates, recurrence at 6-month follow-up, and parental satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25.0, with independent t-tests and chi-square tests applied where appropriate. Results: Both groups achieved comparable deformity correction as reflected by similar final Pirani scores (0.7 ± 0.4 in standard vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 in accelerated, p = 0.312). The accelerated group required significantly fewer casts (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 6.9 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and shorter treatment duration (2.6 ± 0.5 weeks vs. 6.9 ± 1.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Complication and recurrence rates were low and statistically similar in both groups. Parental satisfaction was significantly higher in the accelerated group (mean score 4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The accelerated Ponseti method is a safe and effective alternative to standard casting for relapsed clubfoot, offering faster correction and higher caregiver satisfaction without increasing complications or recurrence. Its adoption may enhance compliance and reduce treatment burden in the Pakistani healthcare setting.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(5)
Benazir Bhutto Hospital (PK), Shifa International Hospital (PK), Primary HealthCare (MT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.