Comparing efficiency of literature-based estimation of general biomass using Length-Weight Relationships (LWRs) between freshwater and seawater fishes

Fish biomass estimation is crucial for understanding aquatic ecosystem dynamics and managing fisheries resources effectively. This study evaluated the applicability of estimating fish biomass in Korean aquatic ecosystems using literature-derived General Total Length (GTL) and length-weight relationships (LWRs). We compared the estimated biomasses with measured field biomasses from literatures for freshwater and seawater fish species. Data on individual biomass, habitat, and length-weight coefficients were collected from the literature and databases for 245 fish species. Biomass was estimated using the GTL and representative LWR coefficients and then they were compared to the measured field biomasses from literature. The results showed that this estimation method was applicable only to freshwater species (R² = 0.7133), whereas the estimates for seawater species showed a poor correlation (negative R² values). The removal of outliers (Q > 6) improved the estimation accuracy for the freshwater species. This study demonstrates that literature-based biomass estimation using GTL and LWRs is appropriate for freshwater fish in Korea, but not for seawater species. These findings contribute to the generation of fundamental biomass data for ecosystem modeling and highlight the need for habitat-specific approaches for biomass estimation. Since habitat specific biomass data is deficient, future research should explore biomass estimation through species extrapolation to address data gaps in aquatic ecological studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321571
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing efficiency of literature-based estimation of general biomass using Length-Weight Relationships (LWRs) between freshwater and seawater fishes

Jaehoon Yeom, Sang Don Kim
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
article

Comparing efficiency of literature-based estimation of general biomass using Length-Weight Relationships (LWRs) between freshwater and seawater fishes

Jaehoon Yeom, Sang Don Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fish biomass estimation is crucial for understanding aquatic ecosystem dynamics and managing fisheries resources effectively. This study evaluated the applicability of estimating fish biomass in Korean aquatic ecosystems using literature-derived General Total Length (GTL) and length-weight relationships (LWRs). We compared the estimated biomasses with measured field biomasses from literatures for freshwater and seawater fish species. Data on individual biomass, habitat, and length-weight coefficients were collected from the literature and databases for 245 fish species. Biomass was estimated using the GTL and representative LWR coefficients and then they were compared to the measured field biomasses from literature. The results showed that this estimation method was applicable only to freshwater species (R² = 0.7133), whereas the estimates for seawater species showed a poor correlation (negative R² values). The removal of outliers (Q > 6) improved the estimation accuracy for the freshwater species. This study demonstrates that literature-based biomass estimation using GTL and LWRs is appropriate for freshwater fish in Korea, but not for seawater species. These findings contribute to the generation of fundamental biomass data for ecosystem modeling and highlight the need for habitat-specific approaches for biomass estimation. Since habitat specific biomass data is deficient, future research should explore biomass estimation through species extrapolation to address data gaps in aquatic ecological studies.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(6)
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.