Exploring the Role of Large Language Models as Artificial Tutors

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into learning environments, their potential to enhance or hinder the acquisition of computational skills remains debated. This study investigates the role of generative AI (GenAI) tools, particularly Harvard's CS50 Duck, in supporting programming education. Through a mixed-methods approach, we examine students' perceptions, engagement, and practical application of the CS50 Duck within our Computational Thinking course. Our results indicate that while proficient students use GenAI tools to reinforce problem-solving skills, struggeling students may over-rely on them, potentially bypassing critical learning processes. Survey and assignment data suggest that students value the non-judgmental feedback provided by the CS50 Duck, yet express nuanced views on GenAI's role in formal assessments and programming education. We show that analysing chat histories can serve as a qualitative framework for examining the interactions between students and artificial tutors, while simultaneously offering critical insights into students' learning processes and the challenges they encounter. This study also underscores the need for instructional strategies that guide responsible GenAI use and highlights the importance of educator involvement in integrating these tools effectively.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016571
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Role of Large Language Models as Artificial Tutors

Benedikt Zönnchen, Martin Hobelsberger, Gudrun Socher, Veronika Thurner et al.
Topic Modeling
article

Exploring the Role of Large Language Models as Artificial Tutors

Benedikt Zönnchen, Martin Hobelsberger, Gudrun Socher, Veronika Thurner, Sarah Ottinger
article en

Abstract

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into learning environments, their potential to enhance or hinder the acquisition of computational skills remains debated. This study investigates the role of generative AI (GenAI) tools, particularly Harvard's CS50 Duck, in supporting programming education. Through a mixed-methods approach, we examine students' perceptions, engagement, and practical application of the CS50 Duck within our Computational Thinking course. Our results indicate that while proficient students use GenAI tools to reinforce problem-solving skills, struggeling students may over-rely on them, potentially bypassing critical learning processes. Survey and assignment data suggest that students value the non-judgmental feedback provided by the CS50 Duck, yet express nuanced views on GenAI's role in formal assessments and programming education. We show that analysing chat histories can serve as a qualitative framework for examining the interactions between students and artificial tutors, while simultaneously offering critical insights into students' learning processes and the challenges they encounter. This study also underscores the need for instructional strategies that guide responsible GenAI use and highlights the importance of educator involvement in integrating these tools effectively.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.