Leveraging AI to Foster Critical Thinking in Engineering Education: Exploring the Three Spheres of Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is widely recognized as essential for education and professional practice, particularly as artificial intelligence (AI) transforms engineering education and work. This paper examines the relationship between AI and critical thinking in engineering through Mejía's three-sphere framework: intelligent tool use, comparative analysis of methods, and socio-technical impacts. We propose a research methodology to evaluate how generative AI can enhance critical thinking capabilities among engineering students. The study employs a mixed-methods approach across two engineering courses, with a framework that focuses on engineering-specific cognitive processes while integrating technical and sociotechnical considerations throughout the engineering lifecycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016607
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging AI to Foster Critical Thinking in Engineering Education: Exploring the Three Spheres of Critical Thinking

Patricia P. Jiménez, Andrés Mejía, Jimena Pascual
1 citations
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

Leveraging AI to Foster Critical Thinking in Engineering Education: Exploring the Three Spheres of Critical Thinking

Patricia P. Jiménez, Andrés Mejía, Jimena Pascual
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Critical thinking is widely recognized as essential for education and professional practice, particularly as artificial intelligence (AI) transforms engineering education and work. This paper examines the relationship between AI and critical thinking in engineering through Mejía's three-sphere framework: intelligent tool use, comparative analysis of methods, and socio-technical impacts. We propose a research methodology to evaluate how generative AI can enhance critical thinking capabilities among engineering students. The study employs a mixed-methods approach across two engineering courses, with a framework that focuses on engineering-specific cognitive processes while integrating technical and sociotechnical considerations throughout the engineering lifecycle.

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Universidad de Los Andes (CO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.