Individual Students Interest and Argumentative Skills Improvement Using Social Media and AJA Strategy

An educational methodology was developed and implemented to increase both argumentative skills and interest as part of students' critical thinking competence, which would allow them to build structure and justified explanations about how engineering systems works. This methodology increases both students' argumentative skills and students' interest in building structured and justified explanations about how engineering systems work. The developed methodology has 3 steps. First, pre intervention evaluation of both argumentative skills and students' interest in developing supported explanations about how engineering systems work. Second, practice of the Affirmation-Justification-Application of sciences laws (AJA) strategy analyzing specific systems and sharing their explanations in a TikTok account. Third, post evaluation of both argumentative skills and the student's interest in developing supported explanations about how engineering systems work. Individual interest in developing structured explanations of how engineering systems work, was studied as a multidimensional construct divided into 4 dimensions: predisposition, affection, intentionality and appreciation. Our study was carried out in the engineering school of a medium size university with 61 students in 2 different campuses. A comparation between the post-test and pre-test argumentative skills using a 90% confidence hypothesis test for difference of paired means shows a significant improvement in this variable. A similar comparison for student's interest in developing structured arguments shows that after using the proposed methodology, students increased their affection, intentionality, and appreciation dimensions, which imply a significant change in their attitude towards engineering systems analysis. This study provides empirical evidence of how a structured methodology for arguing and describing engineering systems can improve competence development of students. We believe that the proposed methodology can be adopted by teachers in other courses to provide students with a framework for their explanations and analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016342
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual Students Interest and Argumentative Skills Improvement Using Social Media and AJA Strategy

A. Flores-Amado, Claudia Hernández, Adriana Amozurrutia-Elizalde, Gibrán Sayeg-Sánchez et al.
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Individual Students Interest and Argumentative Skills Improvement Using Social Media and AJA Strategy

A. Flores-Amado, Claudia Hernández, Adriana Amozurrutia-Elizalde, Gibrán Sayeg-Sánchez, Alexa Cervantes-López
article en

Abstract

An educational methodology was developed and implemented to increase both argumentative skills and interest as part of students' critical thinking competence, which would allow them to build structure and justified explanations about how engineering systems works. This methodology increases both students' argumentative skills and students' interest in building structured and justified explanations about how engineering systems work. The developed methodology has 3 steps. First, pre intervention evaluation of both argumentative skills and students' interest in developing supported explanations about how engineering systems work. Second, practice of the Affirmation-Justification-Application of sciences laws (AJA) strategy analyzing specific systems and sharing their explanations in a TikTok account. Third, post evaluation of both argumentative skills and the student's interest in developing supported explanations about how engineering systems work. Individual interest in developing structured explanations of how engineering systems work, was studied as a multidimensional construct divided into 4 dimensions: predisposition, affection, intentionality and appreciation. Our study was carried out in the engineering school of a medium size university with 61 students in 2 different campuses. A comparation between the post-test and pre-test argumentative skills using a 90% confidence hypothesis test for difference of paired means shows a significant improvement in this variable. A similar comparison for student's interest in developing structured arguments shows that after using the proposed methodology, students increased their affection, intentionality, and appreciation dimensions, which imply a significant change in their attitude towards engineering systems analysis. This study provides empirical evidence of how a structured methodology for arguing and describing engineering systems can improve competence development of students. We believe that the proposed methodology can be adopted by teachers in other courses to provide students with a framework for their explanations and analysis.

Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.