Enhancing Safety Prediction in Accident-prone Zones using Gradient Boosting Machines

The aim of this study is to improve safety prediction in accident hotspots through the use of gradient boosting machines (GBM) and comparing their performance with K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). It measures predictive accuracy, validity, and overall performance in the analysis of accident data. Materials and methods: Group 1applies KNN for safety prediction using 26 samples, measured on 90.4% accuracy, 88.6% recall precision, and F1-score. Group 2 applies GBM for accident risk estimation using 26 samples, measured on the same performance metrics accuracy of 97.5%, a recall of 96.8%. Results: Accuracy for GBM was between 85.4% and 96.7% with a high of 92.5% at a level of significance of 0.0048, while KNN varied between 72.3% and 89.1%. Conclusion: GBM's better feature selection and ensemble learning make it a superior model for real-time estimation of accident risk.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/stcr62650.2025.11019198
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Safety Prediction in Accident-prone Zones using Gradient Boosting Machines

P. Anitha, R. Geetha, P. Kalyanasundaram, Ajit P. Yoganathan et al.
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
article

Enhancing Safety Prediction in Accident-prone Zones using Gradient Boosting Machines

P. Anitha, R. Geetha, P. Kalyanasundaram, Ajit P. Yoganathan, N. Prakash, S. S. Ashwin
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to improve safety prediction in accident hotspots through the use of gradient boosting machines (GBM) and comparing their performance with K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). It measures predictive accuracy, validity, and overall performance in the analysis of accident data. Materials and methods: Group 1applies KNN for safety prediction using 26 samples, measured on 90.4% accuracy, 88.6% recall precision, and F1-score. Group 2 applies GBM for accident risk estimation using 26 samples, measured on the same performance metrics accuracy of 97.5%, a recall of 96.8%. Results: Accuracy for GBM was between 85.4% and 96.7% with a high of 92.5% at a level of significance of 0.0048, while KNN varied between 72.3% and 89.1%. Conclusion: GBM's better feature selection and ensemble learning make it a superior model for real-time estimation of accident risk.

Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.