Single-Measurement Local Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation in the Carotid Artery Using Pulsed Wave Doppler Ultrasound Waveform Indices

Local carotid pulse wave velocity (cPWV), a hemodynamic variable related to arterial stiffness, is a recognized risk indicator for cardiovascular disease. Yet, current methods for its estimation pose challenges, requiring multiple simultaneous local measurements, as is the case for the established Bramwell-Hill (BH) method, or relying on assumptions that may not universally apply, as for single-measurement loop-based methods. This study introduces a novel, non-invasive, single-measurement method for estimating local cPWV. The proposed method relies solely on morphological indices derived from the carotid velocity waveform, measured via pulsed wave Doppler (pw-D) ultrasound. A multivariate regression (MVR) model relating eight such indices to cPWV was trained on a large available virtual cohort (N=5,160), previously generated via one-dimensional hemodynamic modeling. The MVR model was then tested on a clinical dataset of 27 cardiac surgery patients, showing moderate but significant correlation with the reference Bramwell-Hill method (r=0.54, p<0.01), and Bland-Altman values falling within clinically acceptable thresholds (mean difference 0.16 m/s, limits of agreement ±1.98 m/s). The proposed method outperformed the alternative pressure-less flow-area loop (QA-loop) method, which compared poorly to reference BH values (r=0.47, p<0.05, mean difference 0.72 m/s, and limits of agreement ±5.41 m/s). Furthermore, the proposed method showed the lowest intra-subject coefficient of variation (median 2.4%, interquartile range (IQR) 0-4.2%), and measurement-related uncertainty (median 0.11 m/s, IQR 0.07-0.23 m/s) among the three compared methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2025.3571080
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-Measurement Local Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation in the Carotid Artery Using Pulsed Wave Doppler Ultrasound Waveform Indices

Simona Turco, Agata Barbagini, R. Arthur Bouwman, Esmée C. de Boer et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
4.16
article

Single-Measurement Local Pulse Wave Velocity Estimation in the Carotid Artery Using Pulsed Wave Doppler Ultrasound Waveform Indices

Simona Turco, Agata Barbagini, R. Arthur Bouwman, Esmée C. de Boer, Joris van Houte, Massimo Mischi, Irene Suriani, Jens Muehlsteff, Kevin D. Lau
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Local carotid pulse wave velocity (cPWV), a hemodynamic variable related to arterial stiffness, is a recognized risk indicator for cardiovascular disease. Yet, current methods for its estimation pose challenges, requiring multiple simultaneous local measurements, as is the case for the established Bramwell-Hill (BH) method, or relying on assumptions that may not universally apply, as for single-measurement loop-based methods. This study introduces a novel, non-invasive, single-measurement method for estimating local cPWV. The proposed method relies solely on morphological indices derived from the carotid velocity waveform, measured via pulsed wave Doppler (pw-D) ultrasound. A multivariate regression (MVR) model relating eight such indices to cPWV was trained on a large available virtual cohort (N=5,160), previously generated via one-dimensional hemodynamic modeling. The MVR model was then tested on a clinical dataset of 27 cardiac surgery patients, showing moderate but significant correlation with the reference Bramwell-Hill method (r=0.54, p<0.01), and Bland-Altman values falling within clinically acceptable thresholds (mean difference 0.16 m/s, limits of agreement ±1.98 m/s). The proposed method outperformed the alternative pressure-less flow-area loop (QA-loop) method, which compared poorly to reference BH values (r=0.47, p<0.05, mean difference 0.72 m/s, and limits of agreement ±5.41 m/s). Furthermore, the proposed method showed the lowest intra-subject coefficient of variation (median 2.4%, interquartile range (IQR) 0-4.2%), and measurement-related uncertainty (median 0.11 m/s, IQR 0.07-0.23 m/s) among the three compared methods.

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementVol. 74
NXP (Netherlands) (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Philips (Netherlands) (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
4.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.