Determinants of regenerative endodontic therapy use among pediatric and endodontic specialists in 13 countries

This study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the adoption and application of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) among endodontists and pediatric dentists across multiple countries, focusing on demographic, professional, and geographic variability.A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1394 participants from 13 countries. The survey included demographic information, motivational and demotivational factors, and seven clinical scenarios to assess RET application. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for RET adoption using univariate logistic regression. Meta-analysis was performed to account for heterogeneity.The findings revealed significant variability in RET practices. Immature teeth with apical periodontitis and necrotic pulp had the highest odds of RET application (OR = 21.25, 95% CI 16.43-27.49), while mature teeth with necrotic pulp showed significantly lower odds (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.09-0.14). Barriers to RET included insufficient training (25.8%), patient disapproval (17.1%), and concerns over unconvincing results (15.9%). Endodontists were more likely to perform RET than pediatric dentists (OR = 2.11 vs. OR = 1.33), and younger practitioners demonstrated higher adoption rates. Countries like Turkey and Yemen exhibited the highest RET application rates, whereas Serbia and Poland reported minimal adoption.Despite the well-documented biological advantages of RET, its broader adoption is hindered by gaps in training, knowledge, and systemic support. Addressing these barriers through targeted educational initiatives and policy integration can enhance the global implementation of RET, optimizing patient outcomes and advancing endodontic practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04060-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of regenerative endodontic therapy use among pediatric and endodontic specialists in 13 countries

Anna Lehmann, Ömer Hatipoğlu, Muhammad Qasim Javed, Silvana Jukić Krmek et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
5.37
article

Determinants of regenerative endodontic therapy use among pediatric and endodontic specialists in 13 countries

Anna Lehmann, Ömer Hatipoğlu, Muhammad Qasim Javed, Silvana Jukić Krmek, Usman Anwer Bhatti, João Filipe Brochado Martins, Thiyezen Abdullah Aldhelai, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu, Milan Drobac, Ahmed A. Madfa, Nessrin A. Taha, Surendar Sugumaran, Paulo Palma, Afaf Al‐Haddad
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the adoption and application of regenerative endodontic therapy (RET) among endodontists and pediatric dentists across multiple countries, focusing on demographic, professional, and geographic variability.A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1394 participants from 13 countries. The survey included demographic information, motivational and demotivational factors, and seven clinical scenarios to assess RET application. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for RET adoption using univariate logistic regression. Meta-analysis was performed to account for heterogeneity.The findings revealed significant variability in RET practices. Immature teeth with apical periodontitis and necrotic pulp had the highest odds of RET application (OR = 21.25, 95% CI 16.43-27.49), while mature teeth with necrotic pulp showed significantly lower odds (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.09-0.14). Barriers to RET included insufficient training (25.8%), patient disapproval (17.1%), and concerns over unconvincing results (15.9%). Endodontists were more likely to perform RET than pediatric dentists (OR = 2.11 vs. OR = 1.33), and younger practitioners demonstrated higher adoption rates. Countries like Turkey and Yemen exhibited the highest RET application rates, whereas Serbia and Poland reported minimal adoption.Despite the well-documented biological advantages of RET, its broader adoption is hindered by gaps in training, knowledge, and systemic support. Addressing these barriers through targeted educational initiatives and policy integration can enhance the global implementation of RET, optimizing patient outcomes and advancing endodontic practice.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), Qassim University (SA), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR), Sana'a University (YE), University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Zagreb (HR), Riphah International University (PK), Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL), University of Ha'il (SA), Buraydah Colleges (SA), University of Coimbra (PT), Saveetha University (IN), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
5.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.