Neural networks in processing textual objects of Russian literature

This article explores the capabilities and limitations of neural networks in processing textual objects of Russian literature within educational contexts. The study material comprises responses generated by ChatGPT-4o to questions based on a university-level Russian literature curriculum for philology students. The analysis focuses on three key aspects: interpretation of V. Shukshin’s short story “Srezal”, analysis of A. Solzhenitsyn’s “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”, and classification of trends in 20th-century Russian poetry. The results indicate that while ChatGPT produces structurally coherent answers mimicking academic discourse, their quality varies by task type. The most significant discrepancies with original texts occur in literary analysis: the AI introduces factual errors (misnamed characters, distorted plot details) and oversimplifies narrative conflicts. Conversely, its accuracy improves when listing historical-literary facts (poetic movements, authors’ names). The study underscores that integrating AI into literary education necessitates robust verification protocols. The article proposes a framework for critical engagement with neural networks, emphasizing source cross-referencing and the cultivation of students’ analytical competencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36906/2500-1795/25-1/04
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural networks in processing textual objects of Russian literature

Ilya V. Nabiullin
Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Neural networks in processing textual objects of Russian literature

Ilya V. Nabiullin
article en

Abstract

This article explores the capabilities and limitations of neural networks in processing textual objects of Russian literature within educational contexts. The study material comprises responses generated by ChatGPT-4o to questions based on a university-level Russian literature curriculum for philology students. The analysis focuses on three key aspects: interpretation of V. Shukshin’s short story “Srezal”, analysis of A. Solzhenitsyn’s “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich”, and classification of trends in 20th-century Russian poetry. The results indicate that while ChatGPT produces structurally coherent answers mimicking academic discourse, their quality varies by task type. The most significant discrepancies with original texts occur in literary analysis: the AI introduces factual errors (misnamed characters, distorted plot details) and oversimplifies narrative conflicts. Conversely, its accuracy improves when listing historical-literary facts (poetic movements, authors’ names). The study underscores that integrating AI into literary education necessitates robust verification protocols. The article proposes a framework for critical engagement with neural networks, emphasizing source cross-referencing and the cultivation of students’ analytical competencies.

Nizhnevartovsk Philological BulletinVol. 10(1)
Nizhnevartovsk State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neural networks in processing textual objects of Russian literature — Ilya V. Nabiullin · Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS