Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach

Within the framework of our research we intend to show how online reviews could be seen not only as texts, but as digital practices and as part of “communal formations”. In order to justify our claim, we have collected extensive data from different literary review resources as well as reviews of museums and exhibitions, and general discussions of cultural objects from different reviewing platforms. Implementing traditional methods of corpus linguistics, we analyzed the digital review processes by comparing average review and sentence length, normalized distribution of parts of speech and subordinate clauses, and the use of keywords and phrases. As a result, we established that online reviewing is based on platform specific patterns and can be described as a form of “communal formation” that consist of shared knowledge and shared practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.138350
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach

Kristina Petzold, Anna Moskvina
1 citations
Journal of Cultural Analytics
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
article

Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach

Kristina Petzold, Anna Moskvina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Within the framework of our research we intend to show how online reviews could be seen not only as texts, but as digital practices and as part of “communal formations”. In order to justify our claim, we have collected extensive data from different literary review resources as well as reviews of museums and exhibitions, and general discussions of cultural objects from different reviewing platforms. Implementing traditional methods of corpus linguistics, we analyzed the digital review processes by comparing average review and sentence length, normalized distribution of parts of speech and subordinate clauses, and the use of keywords and phrases. As a result, we established that online reviewing is based on platform specific patterns and can be described as a form of “communal formation” that consist of shared knowledge and shared practices.

Journal of Cultural AnalyticsVol. 7(2)
University of Hildesheim (DE), Bielefeld University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Online Reviews as Communal Formations. A Corpus Linguistic Approach — Kristina Petzold, Anna Moskvina · Journal of Cultural Analytics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS