Trade-Offs Between Simplifying Inertial Measurement Unit–Based Movement Recordings and the Attainability of Different Levels of Analyses: Systematic Assessment of Method Variations

The present findings highlight the significant trade-offs between IMU recording configurations and the attainability of sufficiently reliable analyses at different levels. Notably, the single-sensor recordings employed in most of the literature and wearable solutions are of very limited use when assessing the key aspects of real-world movement behavior at relevant temporal resolutions. The minimal configuration with an acceptable classifier performance includes at least a combination of one upper and one lower extremity sensor, at least 13 Hz sampling frequency, and at least an accelerometer, but preferably also a gyroscope (posture kappa=0.89-0.91; movement=0.50-0.53). These findings have direct implications for the design of future studies and wearable solutions that aim to quantify spontaneously occurring postures and movements in natural behaviors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/58078
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade-Offs Between Simplifying Inertial Measurement Unit–Based Movement Recordings and the Attainability of Different Levels of Analyses: Systematic Assessment of Method Variations

Manu Airaksinen, Okko Räsänen, Sampsa Vanhatalo
4 citations
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
19.04
article

Trade-Offs Between Simplifying Inertial Measurement Unit–Based Movement Recordings and the Attainability of Different Levels of Analyses: Systematic Assessment of Method Variations

Manu Airaksinen, Okko Räsänen, Sampsa Vanhatalo
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The present findings highlight the significant trade-offs between IMU recording configurations and the attainability of sufficiently reliable analyses at different levels. Notably, the single-sensor recordings employed in most of the literature and wearable solutions are of very limited use when assessing the key aspects of real-world movement behavior at relevant temporal resolutions. The minimal configuration with an acceptable classifier performance includes at least a combination of one upper and one lower extremity sensor, at least 13 Hz sampling frequency, and at least an accelerometer, but preferably also a gyroscope (posture kappa=0.89-0.91; movement=0.50-0.53). These findings have direct implications for the design of future studies and wearable solutions that aim to quantify spontaneously occurring postures and movements in natural behaviors.

JMIR mhealth and uhealthVol. 13
University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
19.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trade-Offs Between Simplifying Inertial Measurement Unit–Based Movement Recordings and the Attainability of Different Levels of Analyses: Systematic Assessment of Method Variations — Manu Airaksinen, Okko Räsänen, et al. · JMIR mhealth and uhealth (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS