Resilience testing in action – piloting the health system resilience testing tool with a pandemic scenario in Finland

The main benefit of the resilience testing methodology is the ability to bring key actors together to exchange different perspectives on how a health system functions during a crisis. The discussions at the high-level dialogue revealed the need for a mechanism, such as a resilience testing tool, to elucidate the range of practical challenges and how to potentially address them. The discussions also captured themes that are not routinely identified in existing performance assessment mechanisms, such as ethical considerations, values, and political determinants of the health system response. The Finnish pilot study was used to update the structure and facilitation of the resilience testing tool. Further suggested improvements for resilience testing include greater clarification for participants on the scenario, an increased emphasis on recovery and learning, and a greater representation of stakeholders from the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12864-w
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resilience testing in action – piloting the health system resilience testing tool with a pandemic scenario in Finland

Marjaana Viita-aho, Julia Zimmermann, Markku Satokangas, Jonathan Cylus et al.
3 links
BMC Health Services Research
Disaster Response and Management
article

Resilience testing in action – piloting the health system resilience testing tool with a pandemic scenario in Finland

Marjaana Viita-aho, Julia Zimmermann, Markku Satokangas, Jonathan Cylus, Soila Karreinen, Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen, Philip Haywood, Marina Karanikolos, Ilmo Keskimäki
article en

Abstract

The main benefit of the resilience testing methodology is the ability to bring key actors together to exchange different perspectives on how a health system functions during a crisis. The discussions at the high-level dialogue revealed the need for a mechanism, such as a resilience testing tool, to elucidate the range of practical challenges and how to potentially address them. The discussions also captured themes that are not routinely identified in existing performance assessment mechanisms, such as ethical considerations, values, and political determinants of the health system response. The Finnish pilot study was used to update the structure and facilitation of the resilience testing tool. Further suggested improvements for resilience testing include greater clarification for participants on the scenario, an increased emphasis on recovery and learning, and a greater representation of stakeholders from the community.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 25(1)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University (FI), Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
European Commission, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Strategic Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.