Neuromechanisms and subjective experiences during human-dog interactions: Assessing motivation and mental state in a randomized, controlled trial

Animal Assisted Interventions (AAIs) have been shown to have several effects in humans but the underlying cerebral mechanisms are still widely unknown. This research explored the neurological aspects of human-animal interactions. Specifically, we focused on frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA), a feature indicating differences in alpha power between the left and right frontal cortex, which is recognized as a correlate of approach motivation and positive affect. Twenty-nine healthy adults participated in this study, in which we used electroencephalography to measure their brain activity. The study comprised five phases: baseline measurements, interaction with a real dog, interaction with a replica dog, interaction with a plant, and a neutral phase. Participants had both physical and visual contact with the real dog, the replica and the plant, and the procedure was repeated three times for each participant. We also assessed participants' subjective experiences of mental states and intrinsic motivation through the Multidimensional Well-Being and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaires. The objective measurements of motivation and positive affect through FAA did not show a significant difference between interactions with a real dog and control conditions, but the subjective assessments differed. Participants reported significantly higher motivation and a more positive state of mind after interacting with a real dog compared to the control conditions. These results could be considered in therapeutic settings when determining whether to incorporate an animal into a treatment plan. In summary, this study highlights the complexity of human-animal interactions (HAI) and shows an intricate interplay between objective and subjective measurements. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering both neural markers and subjective experiences for understanding the nuanced mechanisms involved in the meaningful connections humans have with animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325325
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuromechanisms and subjective experiences during human-dog interactions: Assessing motivation and mental state in a randomized, controlled trial

Jan Hattendorf, Karin Hediger, Fabio Carbone, Eve-Yaël Gerber et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
article

Neuromechanisms and subjective experiences during human-dog interactions: Assessing motivation and mental state in a randomized, controlled trial

Jan Hattendorf, Karin Hediger, Fabio Carbone, Eve-Yaël Gerber, Camille Rérat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Animal Assisted Interventions (AAIs) have been shown to have several effects in humans but the underlying cerebral mechanisms are still widely unknown. This research explored the neurological aspects of human-animal interactions. Specifically, we focused on frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA), a feature indicating differences in alpha power between the left and right frontal cortex, which is recognized as a correlate of approach motivation and positive affect. Twenty-nine healthy adults participated in this study, in which we used electroencephalography to measure their brain activity. The study comprised five phases: baseline measurements, interaction with a real dog, interaction with a replica dog, interaction with a plant, and a neutral phase. Participants had both physical and visual contact with the real dog, the replica and the plant, and the procedure was repeated three times for each participant. We also assessed participants' subjective experiences of mental states and intrinsic motivation through the Multidimensional Well-Being and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaires. The objective measurements of motivation and positive affect through FAA did not show a significant difference between interactions with a real dog and control conditions, but the subjective assessments differed. Participants reported significantly higher motivation and a more positive state of mind after interacting with a real dog compared to the control conditions. These results could be considered in therapeutic settings when determining whether to incorporate an animal into a treatment plan. In summary, this study highlights the complexity of human-animal interactions (HAI) and shows an intricate interplay between objective and subjective measurements. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering both neural markers and subjective experiences for understanding the nuanced mechanisms involved in the meaningful connections humans have with animals.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(6)
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Lucerne (CH), University of Basel (CH), Swiss Paraplegic Center (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Human-Animal Interaction Studies
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.