Ulnar finger posture effect on a pinch strength

Upper extremity position affects maximum pinch strength; however, there is no consensus regarding the posture of the three ulnar fingers during pinch strength testing, and existing studies have different flexion or extension posture, depending on the measurement method used. This study aimed to clarify the effect of ulnar finger posture on maximum pinch strength and to verify its reliability. Thirty-three participants (19 males and 14 females) performed maximum pulp-to-pulp pinching with both dominant and non-dominant hands. Their ulnar finger posture was tested in two positions (flexion and extension). Measurements were conducted on three separate days by two examiners. Pinch strengths were compared for ulnar finger posture, hand dominance, and sex. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Pinch strength in the flexion posture was significantly stronger than that in the extension posture, regardless of hand dominance or sex (1.34 times greater). Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent in the flexion posture (0.89-0.92) and moderate to good in the extension posture (0.71-0.89). Inter-rater reliability was moderate for both flexion and extension postures (flexion: 0.64-0.68, extension: 0.52-0.54). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent in the flexion posture (0.83-0.91) and moderate in the extension posture (0.71-0.72). These results indicate the importance of hand therapists instructing patients to flex their ulnar fingers during testing to obtain maximum and reliable pinch strength measurements, thereby enhancing the accuracy of hand functional assessment in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325359
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ulnar finger posture effect on a pinch strength

Kazuya Kurauchi, Toshiyuki Fukushima, Toru Sunagawa, Hiroshi Kurumadani et al.
PLoS ONE
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Ulnar finger posture effect on a pinch strength

Kazuya Kurauchi, Toshiyuki Fukushima, Toru Sunagawa, Hiroshi Kurumadani, Yosuke Ishii, Shota Date, Ken Hirao, Naoya Goto, Nanako Nakamae, Naoki Maniwa
article en

Abstract

Upper extremity position affects maximum pinch strength; however, there is no consensus regarding the posture of the three ulnar fingers during pinch strength testing, and existing studies have different flexion or extension posture, depending on the measurement method used. This study aimed to clarify the effect of ulnar finger posture on maximum pinch strength and to verify its reliability. Thirty-three participants (19 males and 14 females) performed maximum pulp-to-pulp pinching with both dominant and non-dominant hands. Their ulnar finger posture was tested in two positions (flexion and extension). Measurements were conducted on three separate days by two examiners. Pinch strengths were compared for ulnar finger posture, hand dominance, and sex. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess intra-rater, inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Pinch strength in the flexion posture was significantly stronger than that in the extension posture, regardless of hand dominance or sex (1.34 times greater). Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent in the flexion posture (0.89-0.92) and moderate to good in the extension posture (0.71-0.89). Inter-rater reliability was moderate for both flexion and extension postures (flexion: 0.64-0.68, extension: 0.52-0.54). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent in the flexion posture (0.83-0.91) and moderate in the extension posture (0.71-0.72). These results indicate the importance of hand therapists instructing patients to flex their ulnar fingers during testing to obtain maximum and reliable pinch strength measurements, thereby enhancing the accuracy of hand functional assessment in clinical practice.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(6)
Hiroshima University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.