Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in grey wolves (Canis lupus) in southwestern Europe

In Europe, studies on tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in wolves are limited, primarily focusing on one population. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of TBPs in grey wolves (Canis lupus) from Spain (n = 129), Italy (n = 113), and Portugal (n = 43) between 2001 and 2023. The presence of Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp., Hepatozoon spp. and piroplasm DNA was analyzed in spleen samples, and risk factors for Hepatozoon canis prevalence were evaluated using a generalized linear model. Overall, 93.3 % (266/285) wolves tested positive to at least one TBP, being H. canis the most prevalent (91.6 %). Babesia canis (1.8 %), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1.4 %), and Babesia capreoli (0.7 %) were detected in small percentages and Ehrlichia spp. and Theileria spp. were not found. Coinfections involving H. canis + B. canis (1.8 %) as well as A. phagocytophilum + B. capreoli (0.4 %) were detected. Hepatozoon canis prevalence was significantly higher in Spain than in Portugal and it was higher in young compared to subadult individuals. The phylogenetic analysis showed the existence of well-defined clades of H. canis. The high prevalence of H. canis indicates that this pathogen is endemic in wolves from these three countries, whereas the importance of Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and piroplasm species seems to be negligible. Our results show a high nucleotide diversity among the H. canis sequences. In addition, our data reveals that wolves from the study countries are infected with TBPs, which could be of health concern. These findings highlight the importance of performing epidemiological studies in wildlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Microbiology
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2025.110579
Primary Topic
Vector-borne infectious diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in grey wolves (Canis lupus) in southwestern Europe

David García‐Dios, Riccardo Orusa, Moisés Gonzálvez, David Cano‐Terriza et al.
2 links
Veterinary Microbiology
Vector-borne infectious diseases
article

Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in grey wolves (Canis lupus) in southwestern Europe

David García‐Dios, Riccardo Orusa, Moisés Gonzálvez, David Cano‐Terriza, Serena Robetto, P. Morrondo, Lisa Guardone, Álvaro Oleaga, Pablo Díaz, Ignacio García‐Bocanegra, Nuno Santos, Saúl Jiménez‐Ruiz, Barbara Moroni, Susana Remesar, Joana Ferreira-E-Silva
article en

Abstract

In Europe, studies on tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in wolves are limited, primarily focusing on one population. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of TBPs in grey wolves (Canis lupus) from Spain (n = 129), Italy (n = 113), and Portugal (n = 43) between 2001 and 2023. The presence of Anaplasma spp., Ehrlichia spp., Hepatozoon spp. and piroplasm DNA was analyzed in spleen samples, and risk factors for Hepatozoon canis prevalence were evaluated using a generalized linear model. Overall, 93.3 % (266/285) wolves tested positive to at least one TBP, being H. canis the most prevalent (91.6 %). Babesia canis (1.8 %), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1.4 %), and Babesia capreoli (0.7 %) were detected in small percentages and Ehrlichia spp. and Theileria spp. were not found. Coinfections involving H. canis + B. canis (1.8 %) as well as A. phagocytophilum + B. capreoli (0.4 %) were detected. Hepatozoon canis prevalence was significantly higher in Spain than in Portugal and it was higher in young compared to subadult individuals. The phylogenetic analysis showed the existence of well-defined clades of H. canis. The high prevalence of H. canis indicates that this pathogen is endemic in wolves from these three countries, whereas the importance of Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and piroplasm species seems to be negligible. Our results show a high nucleotide diversity among the H. canis sequences. In addition, our data reveals that wolves from the study countries are infected with TBPs, which could be of health concern. These findings highlight the importance of performing epidemiological studies in wildlife.

Veterinary MicrobiologyVol. 307
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Gobierno del Principado de Asturias (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (ES), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta (IT), University of Córdoba (ES)
Gobierno del Principado de Asturias, European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Universidad de Córdoba, Xunta de Galicia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, European Social Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Vector-borne infectious diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.