Home or office? The impact of home and office attributes on workplace decisions in hybrid working

• Commuting time and office occupant type are the most influential in shaping choice decisions. • Secondary office spaces (E2) are more influential than core office workplaces (E1), while at home, this is reversed. • Office-workplaces: more than just a desk, eventful, functional secondary spaces and smart technology stand out. • Home-workplaces: Preferred by most, ergonomic workstations and smart technology stand out. • Preferences for single-offices are strongly polarised, while open-offices are less strongly disliked. In a hybrid working context, employees have the flexibility to choose between working at the office or remotely from home. While previous hybrid workplace studies examined home versus office decision-making, there is limited understanding of how the attributes of both environments simultaneously influence workplace choices. This study investigated the impact of seven office and six home workplace attributes on choice behaviour. A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 1812 employees from three Dutch municipalities. A multinomial logit model is used to estimate the choice behaviour, and a random parameter mixed logit model is used to identify heterogeneity along with the choice behaviour. The results show that workplace attributes at the office and home environments significantly shape workplace choices, with varying impacts across different environment zones. Commuting time and office occupant type are the most influential in shaping choice decisions, while office aesthetics and workspace access have the least impact. The secondary (social) office spaces have a stronger influence than the core office-workplace and home-workplace. Eventful, functional secondary (social) spaces and smart technology make the office-workplaces more attractive, while ergonomic workstations and smart technology make the home-workplaces more appealing. Yet, preferences for certain attributes vary among employees. For example, preferences for single offices are highly polarised, with roughly half of the employees strongly preferring them and others disliking them. The results of this study provide insights for designing hybrid workplace settings that accommodate employees' preferences and enhance workplace satisfaction, both at home and in the office.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Building and Environment
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113254
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Home or office? The impact of home and office attributes on workplace decisions in hybrid working

Deniz Tuzcuoğlu, Aloys Borgers, Aslı Sungur, Theo Arentze et al.
Building and Environment
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Home or office? The impact of home and office attributes on workplace decisions in hybrid working

Deniz Tuzcuoğlu, Aloys Borgers, Aslı Sungur, Theo Arentze, Rianne Appel‐Meulenbroek
article en

Abstract

• Commuting time and office occupant type are the most influential in shaping choice decisions. • Secondary office spaces (E2) are more influential than core office workplaces (E1), while at home, this is reversed. • Office-workplaces: more than just a desk, eventful, functional secondary spaces and smart technology stand out. • Home-workplaces: Preferred by most, ergonomic workstations and smart technology stand out. • Preferences for single-offices are strongly polarised, while open-offices are less strongly disliked. In a hybrid working context, employees have the flexibility to choose between working at the office or remotely from home. While previous hybrid workplace studies examined home versus office decision-making, there is limited understanding of how the attributes of both environments simultaneously influence workplace choices. This study investigated the impact of seven office and six home workplace attributes on choice behaviour. A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 1812 employees from three Dutch municipalities. A multinomial logit model is used to estimate the choice behaviour, and a random parameter mixed logit model is used to identify heterogeneity along with the choice behaviour. The results show that workplace attributes at the office and home environments significantly shape workplace choices, with varying impacts across different environment zones. Commuting time and office occupant type are the most influential in shaping choice decisions, while office aesthetics and workspace access have the least impact. The secondary (social) office spaces have a stronger influence than the core office-workplace and home-workplace. Eventful, functional secondary (social) spaces and smart technology make the office-workplaces more attractive, while ergonomic workstations and smart technology make the home-workplaces more appealing. Yet, preferences for certain attributes vary among employees. For example, preferences for single offices are highly polarised, with roughly half of the employees strongly preferring them and others disliking them. The results of this study provide insights for designing hybrid workplace settings that accommodate employees' preferences and enhance workplace satisfaction, both at home and in the office.

Building and EnvironmentVol. 282
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.