Beyond green growth: Mapping sustainability pathways for rural transformations in Norway

Competing sustainability pathways reflect different values and preferred solutions in response to the climate and environmental crisis. The recent Values Assessment by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) states that mobilizing a diversity of sustainability-aligned values (such as care and reciprocity) are key to sustainability transformations. This paper examines the role of values and livelihood options as leverage points for rural sustainability transformations. Drawing on IPBES’s analytical framework, we assess support to four different sustainability pathways in rural Norway: i) green growth, ii) degrowth, iii) earth stewardship, and iv) nature protection. Data was collected from an analysis of fifteen policy documents (N = 15) and a survey (N = 3591) distributed among local population in 12 Norwegian rural municipalities. Three main results are highlighted. First, green growth and associated values firmly dominate sustainability thinking in Norwegian policy agendas for rural development, followed by nature protection, and earth stewardship, while degrowth ideas are only marginally represented. Second, while 17.5 % of survey respondents describe profit or economic growth as key for sustainable development, one fourth (26.1 %) emphasize nature protection, sufficiency, or local production. Finally, green growth supporters emphasize instrumental values through tourism and industry, while degrowth supporters emphasize intrinsic and relational values through localized small-scale farming and resource use. Our results indicate that if Norwegian rural policy is to align with IPBES’ recommendation to balance diverse values for sustainability transformations, rural policies should extend their attention beyond green growth, drawing on alternative sustainability pathways to incorporate a wider diversity of values. • We assess support to four competing sustainability pathways in rural Norway. • Green growth dominates rural policies agendas, while degrowth ideas are marginally represented. • Green growth supporters emphasize instrumental values and livelihood options based on tourism and industry. • One fourth (26.1 %) of respondents perceive sustainability to entail nature protection, sufficiency, or local production. • Norwegian rural policy should extend beyond green growth to incorporate a wider diversity of values and livelihood options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104110
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond green growth: Mapping sustainability pathways for rural transformations in Norway

Erik Gómez‐Baggethun, Elisabeth Veivåg Helseth, Hildegunn Nordtug, Inga Marie Skavhaug
2 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Rural development and sustainability
9.66
article

Beyond green growth: Mapping sustainability pathways for rural transformations in Norway

Erik Gómez‐Baggethun, Elisabeth Veivåg Helseth, Hildegunn Nordtug, Inga Marie Skavhaug
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Competing sustainability pathways reflect different values and preferred solutions in response to the climate and environmental crisis. The recent Values Assessment by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) states that mobilizing a diversity of sustainability-aligned values (such as care and reciprocity) are key to sustainability transformations. This paper examines the role of values and livelihood options as leverage points for rural sustainability transformations. Drawing on IPBES’s analytical framework, we assess support to four different sustainability pathways in rural Norway: i) green growth, ii) degrowth, iii) earth stewardship, and iv) nature protection. Data was collected from an analysis of fifteen policy documents (N = 15) and a survey (N = 3591) distributed among local population in 12 Norwegian rural municipalities. Three main results are highlighted. First, green growth and associated values firmly dominate sustainability thinking in Norwegian policy agendas for rural development, followed by nature protection, and earth stewardship, while degrowth ideas are only marginally represented. Second, while 17.5 % of survey respondents describe profit or economic growth as key for sustainable development, one fourth (26.1 %) emphasize nature protection, sufficiency, or local production. Finally, green growth supporters emphasize instrumental values through tourism and industry, while degrowth supporters emphasize intrinsic and relational values through localized small-scale farming and resource use. Our results indicate that if Norwegian rural policy is to align with IPBES’ recommendation to balance diverse values for sustainability transformations, rural policies should extend their attention beyond green growth, drawing on alternative sustainability pathways to incorporate a wider diversity of values. • We assess support to four competing sustainability pathways in rural Norway. • Green growth dominates rural policies agendas, while degrowth ideas are marginally represented. • Green growth supporters emphasize instrumental values and livelihood options based on tourism and industry. • One fourth (26.1 %) of respondents perceive sustainability to entail nature protection, sufficiency, or local production. • Norwegian rural policy should extend beyond green growth to incorporate a wider diversity of values and livelihood options.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 170
Ruralis - Institute for Rural and Regional Research (NO), Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Rural development and sustainability
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.