Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region

Both, in the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine and in the proliferation of hybrid attacks on EU territory, critical energy infrastructure has become a primary target. One EU- response to the ensuing need for transnational action consists in the CER-Directive of 2022 on the resilience of critical entities. Its effectiveness now hinges on national implementation, currently pervaded by delay despite the undisputable urgency. To begin to shed some light, this study analyses legal implementation of the directive’s predecessor (ECI-Directive of 2008) to assess explanatory approaches from the discipline of implementation studies in the particular field of critical infrastructure protection. Focusing on the hotspot Baltic Sea Region, it shows how country-specific generalized expectations do not hold and how fundamental misfit between pre-existing national frameworks and a directive can instead help predict deviation. For the ECI-Directive, the study shows significant delays and deviation for individual countries, as well as only limited harmonization across the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2025.100781
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region

Mark F. Becker
1 citations
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
Regulation and Compliance Studies
2.23
article

Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region

Mark F. Becker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Both, in the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine and in the proliferation of hybrid attacks on EU territory, critical energy infrastructure has become a primary target. One EU- response to the ensuing need for transnational action consists in the CER-Directive of 2022 on the resilience of critical entities. Its effectiveness now hinges on national implementation, currently pervaded by delay despite the undisputable urgency. To begin to shed some light, this study analyses legal implementation of the directive’s predecessor (ECI-Directive of 2008) to assess explanatory approaches from the discipline of implementation studies in the particular field of critical infrastructure protection. Focusing on the hotspot Baltic Sea Region, it shows how country-specific generalized expectations do not hold and how fundamental misfit between pre-existing national frameworks and a directive can instead help predict deviation. For the ECI-Directive, the study shows significant delays and deviation for individual countries, as well as only limited harmonization across the region.

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure ProtectionVol. 50
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transposing EU-legislation on critical infrastructure protection legal implementation performance in the Baltic Sea region — Mark F. Becker · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS