Sputum culture yields after antibiotic therapy – a retrospective cohort study

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Sputum cultures can guide antibiotic therapy, particularly in severe pneumonia or when resistant pathogens are suspected. However, data on how prior and ongoing antibiotic exposure affects microbial detection are limited. This study aimed to evaluate this impact, stratified by timing and route of administration. <h3>Methods</h3> In- and outpatients from nine hospitals in Skåne, Sweden, who submitted sputum for bacterial culture between 2011 and 2021 were included. Patients requiring specialized pulmonology care (e.g., cystic fibrosis) were excluded. Microbiological results (dichotomized as typical respiratory pathogens versus more opportunistic pathogens) were linked to antibiotic exposure within 30 days prior to sampling, based on hospital records and pharmacy data. Exposure was classified as none, ongoing (oral antibiotics within 7 days or intravenous within 24 hours), or recent (treatment concluded within 30 days and prior to the definition of ongoing). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for microbial detection were calculated with logistic regression models. Time-series analyses plotted detection rates by time since treatment initiation, with linear regression applied. <h3>Results</h3> Among 21361 sputum cultures from 15366 individuals, 46.1% (n=9848) had documented antibiotic exposure. Respiratory pathogens were detected in 19.8% (n=4235) of samples, with significantly higher detection in those without prior antibiotics (26.4%; n=3035 vs. 12.2%; n=1200, p<0.001). Detection of respiratory pathogens was reduced also following recent antibiotic exposure (OR 0.60 [95%CI 0.55 to 0.65]) while opportunistic pathogens were more frequently detected after recent antibiotic exposure (OR 1.51 [95%CI 1.38 to 1.65]). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The results underline that sputum samples should ideally be collected before antibiotic administration. Post-treatment samples yield fewer pathogens and more opportunists, warranting cautious interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CMI Communications
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmicom.2025.105100
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sputum culture yields after antibiotic therapy – a retrospective cohort study

Morton S. Bryer, John Walles, Hanna Rydén, Magnus Paulsson et al.
CMI Communications
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Sputum culture yields after antibiotic therapy – a retrospective cohort study

Morton S. Bryer, John Walles, Hanna Rydén, Magnus Paulsson, Erik Johansson
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objective</h3> Sputum cultures can guide antibiotic therapy, particularly in severe pneumonia or when resistant pathogens are suspected. However, data on how prior and ongoing antibiotic exposure affects microbial detection are limited. This study aimed to evaluate this impact, stratified by timing and route of administration. <h3>Methods</h3> In- and outpatients from nine hospitals in Skåne, Sweden, who submitted sputum for bacterial culture between 2011 and 2021 were included. Patients requiring specialized pulmonology care (e.g., cystic fibrosis) were excluded. Microbiological results (dichotomized as typical respiratory pathogens versus more opportunistic pathogens) were linked to antibiotic exposure within 30 days prior to sampling, based on hospital records and pharmacy data. Exposure was classified as none, ongoing (oral antibiotics within 7 days or intravenous within 24 hours), or recent (treatment concluded within 30 days and prior to the definition of ongoing). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for microbial detection were calculated with logistic regression models. Time-series analyses plotted detection rates by time since treatment initiation, with linear regression applied. <h3>Results</h3> Among 21361 sputum cultures from 15366 individuals, 46.1% (n=9848) had documented antibiotic exposure. Respiratory pathogens were detected in 19.8% (n=4235) of samples, with significantly higher detection in those without prior antibiotics (26.4%; n=3035 vs. 12.2%; n=1200, p<0.001). Detection of respiratory pathogens was reduced also following recent antibiotic exposure (OR 0.60 [95%CI 0.55 to 0.65]) while opportunistic pathogens were more frequently detected after recent antibiotic exposure (OR 1.51 [95%CI 1.38 to 1.65]). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The results underline that sputum samples should ideally be collected before antibiotic administration. Post-treatment samples yield fewer pathogens and more opportunists, warranting cautious interpretation.

CMI CommunicationsVol. 2(3)
Lund University (SE)
Åke Wiberg Stiftelse, Skåne County Council's Research and Development Foundation, Gyllenstiernska Krapperupsstiftelsen
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.