ChatGPT: Hero or Villain? Comparative Evaluation by Canadian High School Students and Teachers
Background: Since its release at the end of 2022 ChatGPT use has become very popular for students and teachers; however, there are no clear instructions on whether it should be banned or allowed for high school-related activities. We assessed the extent, areas, and expectations of current ChatGPT use and evaluated concerns viewed by students and teachers in high school. Methods: Two surveys for high school students and teachers were created. Informed consent obtained from all participants before they completed the survey. Results: Total of 165 responses from students and teachers were analyzed. Both groups have similar familiarity (~80%) with ChatGPT. Study assistance was the most agreeable domain for all groups. Only about 10% viewed that ChatGPT should be banned. Reduced critical thinking ability and learning motivation; inaccuracy output, ethical dilemmas were viewed as the most common ChatGPT disadvantages. Most students and teachers agreed on <25% of ChatGPT allowance in school-related tasks. 40-50% of students and teachers viewed the need for guidelines on proper ChatGPT use. Conclusions: ChatGPT can be both a hero and a villain. There is an urgent need to have clear school ChatGPT guidelines and teaching its correct use in high school setting.
Institutions
- Barrie Urology Group (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v5i3.364
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.65