An Exploratory Study on Coordination Mechanisms in Self-managing Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Types

This study explores the coordination mechanisms that can replace traditional hierarchical structures in boss-less self-managing organizations. To achieve this, a case study was conducted comparing Morning Star and Valve, two organizations renowned for successfully implementing self-management systems in different industrial and structural contexts. The findings reveal that self-managing organizations' coordination mechanisms vary in their application of formal and informal processes, depending on the organizational structure type. Both task coordination and conflict resolution are mainly driven by peer-to-peer mutual adjustments. Regarding task coordination mechanisms, organizations founded on personal contract networks (e.g., traditional manufacturing industries) emphasize individual coordination, where elements like personal ‘missions’ or/and ‘responsibilities’ are central. Conversely, in parallel team-based structures (e.g., knowledge-intensive service industries), intra-team coordination is critical, highlighting ‘collaboration’ or/and ‘creativity’ as key coordination mechanism components. As a result, formal processes tend to be more effective in organizations with personal contract-based structures, whereas informal processes are better suited to parallel team-based structures. Regarding conflict resolution mechanisms, differentiated approaches are required based on organizational structure type. Organizations with personal contract-based networks benefit from a high degree of standardization and procedural consistency, increasing the effectiveness of formal processes. In contrast, parallel team-based structures prioritize (customer-oriented) team flexibility, rendering informal processes more effective for conflict resolution. These findings present meaningful insights for both academia and practitioners, suggesting that self-managing organizations can be viable alternatives to traditional hierarchical organizations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Academy of Management
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26856/kjom.2025.33.2.27
Primary Topic
Collaboration in agile enterprises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploratory Study on Coordination Mechanisms in Self-managing Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Types

Yuan-Jing Jin, Moon-Goo Huh
Korean Academy of Management
Collaboration in agile enterprises
article

An Exploratory Study on Coordination Mechanisms in Self-managing Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Types

Yuan-Jing Jin, Moon-Goo Huh
article en

Abstract

This study explores the coordination mechanisms that can replace traditional hierarchical structures in boss-less self-managing organizations. To achieve this, a case study was conducted comparing Morning Star and Valve, two organizations renowned for successfully implementing self-management systems in different industrial and structural contexts. The findings reveal that self-managing organizations' coordination mechanisms vary in their application of formal and informal processes, depending on the organizational structure type. Both task coordination and conflict resolution are mainly driven by peer-to-peer mutual adjustments. Regarding task coordination mechanisms, organizations founded on personal contract networks (e.g., traditional manufacturing industries) emphasize individual coordination, where elements like personal ‘missions’ or/and ‘responsibilities’ are central. Conversely, in parallel team-based structures (e.g., knowledge-intensive service industries), intra-team coordination is critical, highlighting ‘collaboration’ or/and ‘creativity’ as key coordination mechanism components. As a result, formal processes tend to be more effective in organizations with personal contract-based structures, whereas informal processes are better suited to parallel team-based structures. Regarding conflict resolution mechanisms, differentiated approaches are required based on organizational structure type. Organizations with personal contract-based networks benefit from a high degree of standardization and procedural consistency, increasing the effectiveness of formal processes. In contrast, parallel team-based structures prioritize (customer-oriented) team flexibility, rendering informal processes more effective for conflict resolution. These findings present meaningful insights for both academia and practitioners, suggesting that self-managing organizations can be viable alternatives to traditional hierarchical organizations.

Korean Academy of ManagementVol. 33(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Collaboration in agile enterprises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.