Comparing Integrated Pest Management approaches: European Union vs. United States

Abstract Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a critical strategy for sustainable agriculture, aiming to minimize risks associated with the use of chemical pesticides while managing pest populations effectively. This article compares agricultural IPM implementation strategies, evaluation, and monitoring mechanisms in the European Union (EU) and the United States, highlighting their strengths and challenges. The comparative analysis focuses on regulatory frameworks, implementation strategies, compliance, and enforcement, providing insights into refining global IPM practices for enhanced agricultural sustainability. However, with the recent withdrawal of the EU’s Sustainable Use of Pesticides Regulation, the future of pesticide reduction goals in the EU remains uncertain. This evolving policy landscape provides a timely opportunity to reassess IPM strategies in both regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmaf021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Integrated Pest Management approaches: European Union vs. United States

David Lane
2 citations
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
3.43
article

Comparing Integrated Pest Management approaches: European Union vs. United States

David Lane
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a critical strategy for sustainable agriculture, aiming to minimize risks associated with the use of chemical pesticides while managing pest populations effectively. This article compares agricultural IPM implementation strategies, evaluation, and monitoring mechanisms in the European Union (EU) and the United States, highlighting their strengths and challenges. The comparative analysis focuses on regulatory frameworks, implementation strategies, compliance, and enforcement, providing insights into refining global IPM practices for enhanced agricultural sustainability. However, with the recent withdrawal of the EU’s Sustainable Use of Pesticides Regulation, the future of pesticide reduction goals in the EU remains uncertain. This evolving policy landscape provides a timely opportunity to reassess IPM strategies in both regions.

Journal of Integrated Pest ManagementVol. 16(1)
Cornell University (US)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing Integrated Pest Management approaches: European Union vs. United States — David Lane · Journal of Integrated Pest Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS