Benchmarking artificial neural network extrapolations of the ground-state energies and radii of Li isotopes

We present a comparison of model-space extrapolation methods for No-Core Shell Model calculations of ground-state energies and root-mean-square radii in Li isotopes. In particular, we benchmark the latest machine-learning tools against widely used exponential and infrared extrapolations for energies and crossing point estimates for radii. Our findings demonstrate that, while some machine-learning-based approaches provide reliable predictions with robust statistical uncertainties for both observables even in small model spaces, others perform less consistently. The predictions of the former are compatible with established exponential and infrared extrapolations for energies while also providing a notable improvement over conventional radius estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. C
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.111.064304
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nuclear physics research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking artificial neural network extrapolations of the ground-state energies and radii of Li isotopes

Tobias Wolfgruber, Ryan McCarty, Matthew Lockner, Pieter Maris et al.
2 citations
Physical review. C
Nuclear physics research studies
3.74
article

Benchmarking artificial neural network extrapolations of the ground-state energies and radii of Li isotopes

Tobias Wolfgruber, Ryan McCarty, Matthew Lockner, Pieter Maris, Marco Knöll, James P. Vary, Robert Roth
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We present a comparison of model-space extrapolation methods for No-Core Shell Model calculations of ground-state energies and root-mean-square radii in Li isotopes. In particular, we benchmark the latest machine-learning tools against widely used exponential and infrared extrapolations for energies and crossing point estimates for radii. Our findings demonstrate that, while some machine-learning-based approaches provide reliable predictions with robust statistical uncertainties for both observables even in small model spaces, others perform less consistently. The predictions of the former are compatible with established exponential and infrared extrapolations for energies while also providing a notable improvement over conventional radius estimates.

Physical review. CVol. 111(6)
Iowa State University (US), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Institut für Hochschulforschung (DE)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Office of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nuclear physics research studies
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking artificial neural network extrapolations of the ground-state energies and radii of Li isotopes — Tobias Wolfgruber, Ryan McCarty, et al. · Physical review. C (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS