Meeting report on the round table discussions ‘epigenetics and society’ CLEPIC24

This paper reports and analyses round table discussions at the 2024 Clinical Epigenetics International Conference, which were designed to increase sociotechnical reflexivity, and to develop context-sensitive and practically actionable Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) frameworks in the epigenetics community. Participants focused either on the readiness of the nascent field of epigenetic editing to move from bench to bedside, or on the current state of environmental epigenetic research and its readiness for regulatory risk assessment of chemical safety. The round table discussions gave insight into uncertainties and challenges surrounding the use of epigenetic knowledge in precision environmental health and personalized medicine, such as a lack of knowledge of the complex role of the (epi)genome in health and disease. Moreover, diverse views exist in the epigenetics community concerning the foundational objectives, practical standards and translational goals of epigenetic editing and environmental epigenetics. We believe this highlights the need for an explicit agenda that addresses three intersecting challenges within the epigenetics community. First, we urge the field to explicitly discuss what kinds of knowledge it deems necessary before moving epigenetic applications to the clinic or for public policy purposes. Second, the roundtables revealed a related need for clear methodological and analytical standards to guide research that bridges the gap between basic epigenetic science and its applied potential. Third, the roundtables suggest the existence of a largely unexplored reflexivity among scientists on the evidentiary thresholds, standards of knowledge, and collective commitments that should guide the field in its policy and clinical translations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epigenetics Communications
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43682-025-00035-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meeting report on the round table discussions ‘epigenetics and society’ CLEPIC24

Luca Chiapperino, Michelle Habets, Marianne G Rots
2 citations
Epigenetics Communications
Race, Genetics, and Society
3.63
article

Meeting report on the round table discussions ‘epigenetics and society’ CLEPIC24

Luca Chiapperino, Michelle Habets, Marianne G Rots
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper reports and analyses round table discussions at the 2024 Clinical Epigenetics International Conference, which were designed to increase sociotechnical reflexivity, and to develop context-sensitive and practically actionable Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) frameworks in the epigenetics community. Participants focused either on the readiness of the nascent field of epigenetic editing to move from bench to bedside, or on the current state of environmental epigenetic research and its readiness for regulatory risk assessment of chemical safety. The round table discussions gave insight into uncertainties and challenges surrounding the use of epigenetic knowledge in precision environmental health and personalized medicine, such as a lack of knowledge of the complex role of the (epi)genome in health and disease. Moreover, diverse views exist in the epigenetics community concerning the foundational objectives, practical standards and translational goals of epigenetic editing and environmental epigenetics. We believe this highlights the need for an explicit agenda that addresses three intersecting challenges within the epigenetics community. First, we urge the field to explicitly discuss what kinds of knowledge it deems necessary before moving epigenetic applications to the clinic or for public policy purposes. Second, the roundtables revealed a related need for clear methodological and analytical standards to guide research that bridges the gap between basic epigenetic science and its applied potential. Third, the roundtables suggest the existence of a largely unexplored reflexivity among scientists on the evidentiary thresholds, standards of knowledge, and collective commitments that should guide the field in its policy and clinical translations.

Epigenetics CommunicationsVol. 5(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Rathenau Instituut (NL), Institute of Social Sciences (RS), Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Race, Genetics, and Society
3.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.