Ethical Concerns of AI in Psychological Support: Privacy and Empathy Issues

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into psychological support systems has raised significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding privacy and empathy. This study employed in-depth interviews with 35 diverse participants, including students, healthcare professionals, and technologists, to explore their perceptions of AI’s role in mental health support. Qualitative analysis revealed two predominant concerns: privacy risks and AI’s lack of empathetic capacity. Approximately 28.6% of participants expressed apprehension about data security and confidentiality, citing fears of breaches and over-reliance on AI systems that may mishandle sensitive personal information1. More prominently, 42.9% highlighted AI’s inability to replicate human empathy, noting its failure to interpret emotional nuances, cultural contexts, or individual experiences critical to effective psychological care2. Additional concerns included over-dependence on AI, the risk of generic or inaccurate advice, and the potential erosion of human connection in therapeutic settings3. These findings underscore the need for ethical AI frameworks that prioritize robust privacy protections and integrate human oversight to address empathy deficits. By illuminating stakeholder perspectives, this study contributes to the discourse on designing AI systems that balance technological innovation with the emotional and ethical demands of mental health support.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56975/jetir.v12i5.563538
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Concerns of AI in Psychological Support: Privacy and Empathy Issues

Deepak Sharma, Sagar Bayaskar, Navin Barde
Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Ethical Concerns of AI in Psychological Support: Privacy and Empathy Issues

Deepak Sharma, Sagar Bayaskar, Navin Barde
article en

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into psychological support systems has raised significant ethical concerns, particularly regarding privacy and empathy. This study employed in-depth interviews with 35 diverse participants, including students, healthcare professionals, and technologists, to explore their perceptions of AI’s role in mental health support. Qualitative analysis revealed two predominant concerns: privacy risks and AI’s lack of empathetic capacity. Approximately 28.6% of participants expressed apprehension about data security and confidentiality, citing fears of breaches and over-reliance on AI systems that may mishandle sensitive personal information1. More prominently, 42.9% highlighted AI’s inability to replicate human empathy, noting its failure to interpret emotional nuances, cultural contexts, or individual experiences critical to effective psychological care2. Additional concerns included over-dependence on AI, the risk of generic or inaccurate advice, and the potential erosion of human connection in therapeutic settings3. These findings underscore the need for ethical AI frameworks that prioritize robust privacy protections and integrate human oversight to address empathy deficits. By illuminating stakeholder perspectives, this study contributes to the discourse on designing AI systems that balance technological innovation with the emotional and ethical demands of mental health support.

Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative ResearchVol. 12(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.