A neo-complexity orientation to action research: perspectives on unpredictability and ethics

The influence of complexity theory on action research scholarship and practice has been kaleidoscopic. Further integrating ideas derived from the complexity sciences could enrich this research tradition, but there are choices to be made about what to prioritise. We distinguish complexity-informed approaches that privilege control from those adopting radical open-endedness. The former often aligns with managerialist assumptions, which tend to deny the messiness and moral dimensions of living and working. In contrast, ‘neo-complexity’ aims to reemphasise the most intellectually, politically, and emotionally radical implications of complexity science: embracing unpredictability, plurality, and practice-based ethics. An example of an action research coalition of Ethiopia, Mursi and UK researchers allows us to describe what this means in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJAR – International Journal of Action Research
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v21i1.04
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A neo-complexity orientation to action research: perspectives on unpredictability and ethics

Karina Solsø, Emma Crewe, Kiran Chauhan
1 links
IJAR – International Journal of Action Research
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

A neo-complexity orientation to action research: perspectives on unpredictability and ethics

Karina Solsø, Emma Crewe, Kiran Chauhan
article en

Abstract

The influence of complexity theory on action research scholarship and practice has been kaleidoscopic. Further integrating ideas derived from the complexity sciences could enrich this research tradition, but there are choices to be made about what to prioritise. We distinguish complexity-informed approaches that privilege control from those adopting radical open-endedness. The former often aligns with managerialist assumptions, which tend to deny the messiness and moral dimensions of living and working. In contrast, ‘neo-complexity’ aims to reemphasise the most intellectually, politically, and emotionally radical implications of complexity science: embracing unpredictability, plurality, and practice-based ethics. An example of an action research coalition of Ethiopia, Mursi and UK researchers allows us to describe what this means in practice.

IJAR – International Journal of Action ResearchVol. 21(1-2025)
University of London (GB), University of Hertfordshire (GB), SOAS University of London (GB), Universidad de Londres (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A neo-complexity orientation to action research: perspectives on unpredictability and ethics — Karina Solsø, Emma Crewe, et al. · IJAR – International Journal of Action Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS