“Barriers to Men’s Enrollment in the Feminized Space of College Sex Education Courses”

There is a notable gender gap in enrollment in college-level sex education classes across the US, with men being reluctant to enroll. This is not surprising because, in an androcentric society, men commonly avoid feminized spaces. Men who do enter feminized spaces tend to view themselves as “good guys” who are more sensitive to gender inequality than other men. Using a grounded theory approach, we analyzed interviews with 17 men college students who had not enrolled in a sexuality education course. We found these men also saw themselves as good guys. They constructed and distanced themselves from an archetypal “hyper-masculinized other,” deploying two central narratives: (1) good guys don’t need sex education and (2) other guys aren’t interested in sex education. Ultimately, when contrasting themselves against a hyper-masculinized other, participants projected their gendered understandings of sexuality onto other men and emerged as good guys who absolved themselves from responsibility for taking action to promote equitable sexual relationships. As long as men who exclude themselves from feminized spaces project inferior forms of masculinity onto other men, they will not enter these spaces nor receive their potential benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Men and Masculinities
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x251346490
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Barriers to Men’s Enrollment in the Feminized Space of College Sex Education Courses”

Heather Hensman Kettrey, Savannah R. Burke
1 citations
Men and Masculinities
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
3.87
article

“Barriers to Men’s Enrollment in the Feminized Space of College Sex Education Courses”

Heather Hensman Kettrey, Savannah R. Burke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a notable gender gap in enrollment in college-level sex education classes across the US, with men being reluctant to enroll. This is not surprising because, in an androcentric society, men commonly avoid feminized spaces. Men who do enter feminized spaces tend to view themselves as “good guys” who are more sensitive to gender inequality than other men. Using a grounded theory approach, we analyzed interviews with 17 men college students who had not enrolled in a sexuality education course. We found these men also saw themselves as good guys. They constructed and distanced themselves from an archetypal “hyper-masculinized other,” deploying two central narratives: (1) good guys don’t need sex education and (2) other guys aren’t interested in sex education. Ultimately, when contrasting themselves against a hyper-masculinized other, participants projected their gendered understandings of sexuality onto other men and emerged as good guys who absolved themselves from responsibility for taking action to promote equitable sexual relationships. As long as men who exclude themselves from feminized spaces project inferior forms of masculinity onto other men, they will not enter these spaces nor receive their potential benefits.

Men and Masculinities
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.