THE COMPARISON BETWEEN “RUSSIAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TEACHING RUSSIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE” AND “CHINESE PROFICIENCY GRADING STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL CHINESE LANGUAGE EDUCATION”

A comparative study of “Russian State Standards for Russian as a Foreign Language” and “Standard for Assessing Chinese Language Proficiency in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language” is reviewed. Based on an overview of the principles and purposes of language standards development, the foreign language proficiency of the two countries are compared and analyzed in terms of their content framework, language skills description and internationalization. The comparative studies have shown that there is an urgent need for the “Chinese Standard” to establish a testing system that can be borrowed from the “Russian Standards”. The paper revealed that “Chinese Standard” is to be improved, and its application in testing will still be developed. The comparative study of standards has shown that it will help the development of international education in China and beyond, besides providing theoretical and practical basis for the international application of “Chinese Standard” and the compilation of relevant test, control and practice tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36979/1694-500x-2025-25-2-164-175
Primary Topic
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN “RUSSIAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TEACHING RUSSIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE” AND “CHINESE PROFICIENCY GRADING STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL CHINESE LANGUAGE EDUCATION”

Dan Huang, N.V. Dikova
Vestnik of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
article

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN “RUSSIAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TEACHING RUSSIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE” AND “CHINESE PROFICIENCY GRADING STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL CHINESE LANGUAGE EDUCATION”

Dan Huang, N.V. Dikova
article en

Abstract

A comparative study of “Russian State Standards for Russian as a Foreign Language” and “Standard for Assessing Chinese Language Proficiency in Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language” is reviewed. Based on an overview of the principles and purposes of language standards development, the foreign language proficiency of the two countries are compared and analyzed in terms of their content framework, language skills description and internationalization. The comparative studies have shown that there is an urgent need for the “Chinese Standard” to establish a testing system that can be borrowed from the “Russian Standards”. The paper revealed that “Chinese Standard” is to be improved, and its application in testing will still be developed. The comparative study of standards has shown that it will help the development of international education in China and beyond, besides providing theoretical and practical basis for the international application of “Chinese Standard” and the compilation of relevant test, control and practice tasks.

Vestnik of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic UniversityVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Foreign Language Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN “RUSSIAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TEACHING RUSSIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE” AND “CHINESE PROFICIENCY GRADING STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL CHINESE LANGUAGE EDUCATION” — Dan Huang, N.V. Dikova · Vestnik of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS