Management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics: Artificial intelligence-based fusion framework

• Develop an AI-based fusion framework ( f f ) for numerical evaluation of authentication methods. • Present research processes taxonomy based on fusion and fuzzy strategies. • Give overview and comparison of both related studies and traditional versus modern methods. • Provide more realistic quantification results when comparing other frameworks. • Discuss information challenges and future directions related to AI algorithms. While the literature extensively covers various authentication systems, management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics remain significant information challenges for researchers. To overcome this complex challenge, we present a taxonomy of research processes based on fusion and fuzzy strategies and give an overview and comparison of related studies. Specifically, we develop an artificial intelligence-based fusion framework ( f f ) incorporating Mamdani-type fuzzy rules and key user factors: security, privacy, and trust. Its uniqueness and innovation lie in the application of trapezoidal functions to describe these factors as key input metric values. Moreover, we are the first to incorporate trust as an independent comparative factor and provide a comparison of traditional and modern authentication methods, including artificial intelligence (AI), electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) methods. Also, we use a workflow diagram to define the topological relationships among user factors and authentication factors, clarifying the role of fusion in multi-factor authentication (MFA) approaches. In comparison to other similar frameworks implemented solely for traditional methods, the proposed f f yields better and more realistic quantification metric results. In addition, we present and discuss the key mathematical differences between one-factor authentication (1FA) and MFA, aiming to shed light on issues such as complexity and bias. Lastly, the developed f f not only advances MFA metrics by introducing modern authentication methods such as AI, EEG, ECG, and PPG but also paves the way for future research on how and why AI algorithms need to be incorporated into information processing and the creation of strong MFA solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Processing & Management
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104233
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics: Artificial intelligence-based fusion framework

Boris Damjanović, Dragan Korać, Cong Pu, Dejan Simić
3 citations
Information Processing & Management
Digital Transformation in Industry
3.73
article

Management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics: Artificial intelligence-based fusion framework

Boris Damjanović, Dragan Korać, Cong Pu, Dejan Simić
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Develop an AI-based fusion framework ( f f ) for numerical evaluation of authentication methods. • Present research processes taxonomy based on fusion and fuzzy strategies. • Give overview and comparison of both related studies and traditional versus modern methods. • Provide more realistic quantification results when comparing other frameworks. • Discuss information challenges and future directions related to AI algorithms. While the literature extensively covers various authentication systems, management of evaluation processes and creation of authentication metrics remain significant information challenges for researchers. To overcome this complex challenge, we present a taxonomy of research processes based on fusion and fuzzy strategies and give an overview and comparison of related studies. Specifically, we develop an artificial intelligence-based fusion framework ( f f ) incorporating Mamdani-type fuzzy rules and key user factors: security, privacy, and trust. Its uniqueness and innovation lie in the application of trapezoidal functions to describe these factors as key input metric values. Moreover, we are the first to incorporate trust as an independent comparative factor and provide a comparison of traditional and modern authentication methods, including artificial intelligence (AI), electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiographic (ECG), and photoplethysmogram (PPG) methods. Also, we use a workflow diagram to define the topological relationships among user factors and authentication factors, clarifying the role of fusion in multi-factor authentication (MFA) approaches. In comparison to other similar frameworks implemented solely for traditional methods, the proposed f f yields better and more realistic quantification metric results. In addition, we present and discuss the key mathematical differences between one-factor authentication (1FA) and MFA, aiming to shed light on issues such as complexity and bias. Lastly, the developed f f not only advances MFA metrics by introducing modern authentication methods such as AI, EEG, ECG, and PPG but also paves the way for future research on how and why AI algorithms need to be incorporated into information processing and the creation of strong MFA solutions.

Information Processing & ManagementVol. 62(6)
Oklahoma State University (US), University of Banja Luka (BA), University of Belgrade (RS), Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Transformation in Industry
3.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.