Balancing the Cognitive Highwire: The Effect of <scp>CEO</scp>–<scp>TMT</scp> Shared Cognition on Radical Innovation and Innovation Efficiency

ABSTRACT Radical innovation and innovation efficiency are important for a firm's competitive advantage. Past research has established that the firm's upper echelons disproportionately contribute to the radicalness and efficiency of innovation efforts. Relying on a social‐interactionism view of the CEO–TMT interface, we study the effects of CEO–TMT shared cognition in the form of subconscious cohesion and collective thinking, which is understood as relational adaptation at the group level on firms' attainment of radical innovation and innovation efficiency. We test our hypotheses on firms listed in the S&amp;P 500 for at least three consecutive years between 2005 and 2018 and find that CEO–TMT shared cognition positively affects firms' pursuit of radical innovation, up to a certain point, at which shared cognition negatively affects firms' pursuit of radical innovation. We posit that the positive effect persists due to increasing CEO–TMT cohesion and concomitant confidence in pursuing high‐risk business endeavors. After a certain point, these positive effects are outweighed by the negative effect of groupthink, which limits divergent thinking and creativity. These effects differ for innovation efficiency, which increases linearly with CEO–TMT shared cognition and its effects on cohesion. Supplementary analyses on organizational slack further contextualize these findings. High‐discretion slack may dampen the benefits of cohesion and confidence, while low‐discretion slack appears to reinforce them. Our study develops the understanding of radical innovation and innovation efficiency, contributing to the literature on shared leadership at the CEO–TMT interface. It offers valuable insights for innovation decision‐makers, guiding them on the path to achieving breakthrough innovations and innovation efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12794
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing the Cognitive Highwire: The Effect of CEO–TMT Shared Cognition on Radical Innovation and Innovation Efficiency

Stephan Nüesch, Christopher Albert Sabel, David Lohmar
3 citations
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Family Business Performance and Succession
8.29
article

Balancing the Cognitive Highwire: The Effect of CEO–TMT Shared Cognition on Radical Innovation and Innovation Efficiency

Stephan Nüesch, Christopher Albert Sabel, David Lohmar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Radical innovation and innovation efficiency are important for a firm's competitive advantage. Past research has established that the firm's upper echelons disproportionately contribute to the radicalness and efficiency of innovation efforts. Relying on a social‐interactionism view of the CEO–TMT interface, we study the effects of CEO–TMT shared cognition in the form of subconscious cohesion and collective thinking, which is understood as relational adaptation at the group level on firms' attainment of radical innovation and innovation efficiency. We test our hypotheses on firms listed in the S&amp;P 500 for at least three consecutive years between 2005 and 2018 and find that CEO–TMT shared cognition positively affects firms' pursuit of radical innovation, up to a certain point, at which shared cognition negatively affects firms' pursuit of radical innovation. We posit that the positive effect persists due to increasing CEO–TMT cohesion and concomitant confidence in pursuing high‐risk business endeavors. After a certain point, these positive effects are outweighed by the negative effect of groupthink, which limits divergent thinking and creativity. These effects differ for innovation efficiency, which increases linearly with CEO–TMT shared cognition and its effects on cohesion. Supplementary analyses on organizational slack further contextualize these findings. High‐discretion slack may dampen the benefits of cohesion and confidence, while low‐discretion slack appears to reinforce them. Our study develops the understanding of radical innovation and innovation efficiency, contributing to the literature on shared leadership at the CEO–TMT interface. It offers valuable insights for innovation decision‐makers, guiding them on the path to achieving breakthrough innovations and innovation efficiency.

Journal of Product Innovation Management
University of Fribourg (CH), University of Münster (DE), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Family Business Performance and Succession
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.