SHIELD: an evaluation benchmark for face spoofing and forgery detection with multimodal large language models

Abstract Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-related tasks, capitalizing on their visual semantic comprehension and reasoning capabilities. However, their ability to detect subtle visual spoofing and forgery clues in face attack detection tasks remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce a benchmark, SHIELD , to evaluate MLLMs for face spoofing and forgery detection. Specifically, we design true/false and multiple-choice questions to assess MLLM performance on multimodal face data across two tasks. For the face anti-spoofing task, we evaluate three modalities (i.e., RGB, infrared, and depth) under six attack types. For the face forgery detection task, we evaluate GAN-based and diffusion-based data, incorporating visual and acoustic modalities. We conduct zero-shot and few-shot evaluations in standard and chain of thought (COT) settings. Additionally, we propose a novel multi-attribute chain of thought (MA-COT) paradigm for describing and judging various task-specific and task-irrelevant attributes of face images. The findings of this study demonstrate that MLLMs exhibit strong potential for addressing the challenges associated with the security of facial recognition technology applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Visual Intelligence
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44267-025-00079-w
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Biometric Identification and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SHIELD: an evaluation benchmark for face spoofing and forgery detection with multimodal large language models

Yingxin Lai, Jun Wan, Xiaochun Cao, Lei He et al.
12 citations
Visual Intelligence
Biometric Identification and Security
17.82
article

SHIELD: an evaluation benchmark for face spoofing and forgery detection with multimodal large language models

Yingxin Lai, Jun Wan, Xiaochun Cao, Lei He, Changsheng Chen, Hongyang Wang, Jun Feng, Yuhao Gao, Yichen Shi, Zitong Yu
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-related tasks, capitalizing on their visual semantic comprehension and reasoning capabilities. However, their ability to detect subtle visual spoofing and forgery clues in face attack detection tasks remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce a benchmark, SHIELD , to evaluate MLLMs for face spoofing and forgery detection. Specifically, we design true/false and multiple-choice questions to assess MLLM performance on multimodal face data across two tasks. For the face anti-spoofing task, we evaluate three modalities (i.e., RGB, infrared, and depth) under six attack types. For the face forgery detection task, we evaluate GAN-based and diffusion-based data, incorporating visual and acoustic modalities. We conduct zero-shot and few-shot evaluations in standard and chain of thought (COT) settings. Additionally, we propose a novel multi-attribute chain of thought (MA-COT) paradigm for describing and judging various task-specific and task-irrelevant attributes of face images. The findings of this study demonstrate that MLLMs exhibit strong potential for addressing the challenges associated with the security of facial recognition technology applications.

Visual IntelligenceVol. 3(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Shenzhen University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), UCLA Health (US), Institute of Automation (CN), Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (CN)
Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Biometric Identification and Security
17.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.