Utility of near‐surface phenology in estimating productivity and evapotranspiration across diverse ecosystems

Agroecosystems, which include row crops, pasture, and grass and shrub grazing lands, are sensitive to changes in management, weather, and genetics. To better understand how these systems are responding to changes, we need to improve monitoring and modeling carbon and water dynamics. Vegetation Indices (VIs) are commonly used to estimate gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET), but these empirical relationships are often location and crop specific. There is a need to evaluate if VIs can be effective and, more general, predictors of ecosystem processes through time and across different agroecosystems. Near-surface photographic (red-green-blue) images from PhenoCam can be used to calculate the VI green chromatic coordinate (G<sub>CC</sub>) and offer a pathway to improve understanding of field-scale relationships between VIs and GPP and ET. We synthesized observations spanning 76 site-years across 15 agroecosystem sites with PhenoCam G<sub>CC</sub> and GPP or ET estimates from eddy covariance (EC) to quantify interannual variability (IAV) in the relationship between GPP and ET and G<sub>CC</sub> across. We uncovered a high degree of variability in the strength and slopes of the G<sub>CC</sub> ∼ GPP and ET relationships (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.1 - 0.9) within and across production systems. Overall, G<sub>CC</sub> is a better predictor of GPP than ET (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.64 and 0.54, respectively), performing best in croplands (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.91). Shrub-dominated systems exhibit the lowest predictive power of G<sub>CC</sub> for GPP and ET but have less IAV in slope. We propose that PhenoCam estimates of G<sub>CC</sub> could provide an alternative approach for predictions of ecosystem processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Quality
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70043
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of near‐surface phenology in estimating productivity and evapotranspiration across diverse ecosystems

Russell L. Scott, M. . Inst. for Tropical Maritz, Craig W. Whippo, M. E. Litvak et al.
Journal of Environmental Quality
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Utility of near‐surface phenology in estimating productivity and evapotranspiration across diverse ecosystems

Russell L. Scott, M. . Inst. for Tropical Maritz, Craig W. Whippo, M. E. Litvak, Maria L. Silveira, Patrick E. Clark, David L. Hoover, Claire L. Phillips, G. N. Flerchinger, Sander O. Denham, John H. Prueger, Rosvel Bracho, Dawn M. Browning, David R. Huggins, Sarah Goslee, Joe Alfieri, Adam P. Schreiner‐McGraw, B. J. Dalzell
article en

Abstract

Agroecosystems, which include row crops, pasture, and grass and shrub grazing lands, are sensitive to changes in management, weather, and genetics. To better understand how these systems are responding to changes, we need to improve monitoring and modeling carbon and water dynamics. Vegetation Indices (VIs) are commonly used to estimate gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET), but these empirical relationships are often location and crop specific. There is a need to evaluate if VIs can be effective and, more general, predictors of ecosystem processes through time and across different agroecosystems. Near-surface photographic (red-green-blue) images from PhenoCam can be used to calculate the VI green chromatic coordinate (G<sub>CC</sub>) and offer a pathway to improve understanding of field-scale relationships between VIs and GPP and ET. We synthesized observations spanning 76 site-years across 15 agroecosystem sites with PhenoCam G<sub>CC</sub> and GPP or ET estimates from eddy covariance (EC) to quantify interannual variability (IAV) in the relationship between GPP and ET and G<sub>CC</sub> across. We uncovered a high degree of variability in the strength and slopes of the G<sub>CC</sub> ∼ GPP and ET relationships (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.1 - 0.9) within and across production systems. Overall, G<sub>CC</sub> is a better predictor of GPP than ET (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.64 and 0.54, respectively), performing best in croplands (R<sup>2 </sup>= 0.91). Shrub-dominated systems exhibit the lowest predictive power of G<sub>CC</sub> for GPP and ET but have less IAV in slope. We propose that PhenoCam estimates of G<sub>CC</sub> could provide an alternative approach for predictions of ecosystem processes.

Journal of Environmental QualityVol. 54(5)
Agricultural Research Service (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of Florida (US), Northwest Watershed Research Center (US), Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory (US), Quality Research (US), Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory (US), Southwest Watershed Research Center (US), National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment (US)
Northeastern States Research Cooperative, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.