Validation of a self-assessment survey on knowledge and perceptions of LGBTIQ+ student inclusion in education degree programs

the aim of this paper is to present the findings of the validation process of the Self-Assessment Questionnaire on University Students' Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding the Inclusion of LGBTIQ + Students . Method : this was an instrumental study. The reference population comprised students on bachelors', masters' and MEd degrees in Spanish education faculties. The pilot sample consisted of 334 people. For validation, construct validity was tested firstly with an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and subsequently with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's Alpha was used to establish reliability. Findings : the EFA yielded three major factors for the Knowledge Scale and four for the Perceptions Scale , verifying their correspondence with the conceptual structure of the questionnaire. The CFA indicated a good fit for the model, with acceptable incremental fit measures (TLI, ILI, CFI: .90) and RMSEA and SRMR residuals (.06). Likewise, the parsimony indices were high (above .07). Reliability was found to be excellent (with values above .90) for all the scales studied. Conclusion : the Self-Assessment Questionnaire , in the light of the validation process carried out, constitutes a robust, reliable and valid instrument for determining education students' knowledge and perceptions of LGBTIQ + diversity and its inclusion in their academic-professional profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101568
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a self-assessment survey on knowledge and perceptions of LGBTIQ+ student inclusion in education degree programs

José Tejada Fernández, Antonio Navío Gámez, Pedro Jurado de los Santos, Robert G. Valls-Figuera
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Validation of a self-assessment survey on knowledge and perceptions of LGBTIQ+ student inclusion in education degree programs

José Tejada Fernández, Antonio Navío Gámez, Pedro Jurado de los Santos, Robert G. Valls-Figuera
article en

Abstract

the aim of this paper is to present the findings of the validation process of the Self-Assessment Questionnaire on University Students' Knowledge and Perceptions Regarding the Inclusion of LGBTIQ + Students . Method : this was an instrumental study. The reference population comprised students on bachelors', masters' and MEd degrees in Spanish education faculties. The pilot sample consisted of 334 people. For validation, construct validity was tested firstly with an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and subsequently with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Cronbach's Alpha was used to establish reliability. Findings : the EFA yielded three major factors for the Knowledge Scale and four for the Perceptions Scale , verifying their correspondence with the conceptual structure of the questionnaire. The CFA indicated a good fit for the model, with acceptable incremental fit measures (TLI, ILI, CFI: .90) and RMSEA and SRMR residuals (.06). Likewise, the parsimony indices were high (above .07). Reliability was found to be excellent (with values above .90) for all the scales studied. Conclusion : the Self-Assessment Questionnaire , in the light of the validation process carried out, constitutes a robust, reliable and valid instrument for determining education students' knowledge and perceptions of LGBTIQ + diversity and its inclusion in their academic-professional profiles.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 11
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.