Endogenous integration of qualitative factors into quantitative energy transition modelling for development

Energy transition research in low- and middle-income countries often employs quantitative modelling to analyse possible future development pathways which leverage clean, renewable, and efficient energy to meet societal needs and promote development. Yet such quantitative methods are often critiqued for their reductionary nature, and failure to capture the wider contextual real-world complexities in which energy decisions are made. Integrating qualitative considerations into energy modelling offers an opportunity to reflect these complexities and strengthen techno-economic research, particularly when these considerations can be structurally integrated into models themselves. By developing a framework for endogenous qualitative integration into energy transition modelling for development – through extensive stakeholder co-production, qualitative storylines, and contextual analysis – this paper outlines feasible steps for qualitative incorporation at all phases of the modelling research process. Supported by the results of a systematic literature review, it recommends that qualitative considerations, such as social dynamics, human behaviour and institutional factors - alongside a particular focus on gender and social inclusion, resilience and climate adaptation awareness - be examined and integrated at all stages of the modelling research process, conceptualised into four phases: (1) ‘Pre-Modelling’, (2) ‘Storytelling and Narratives’, (3) ‘The Model’, and (4) ‘Beyond the Model’. • Addresses the unique needs of energy modelling research within low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). • A framework for qualitative integration into all stages of the energy modelling research to aid development is outlined. • A framework for endogenous qualitative integration into energy transition model structures is developed. • Using this framework energy modelling results can be more inclusive, meaningful, and realistic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115917
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endogenous integration of qualitative factors into quantitative energy transition modelling for development

Mark Howells, Edward Brown, Mwansa Kaoma, Neve Fields et al.
3 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.19
article

Endogenous integration of qualitative factors into quantitative energy transition modelling for development

Mark Howells, Edward Brown, Mwansa Kaoma, Neve Fields, Alycia Leonard, Marissa Bergman, Leigh Martindale, Martin Mutembei, Anne Nganga
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Energy transition research in low- and middle-income countries often employs quantitative modelling to analyse possible future development pathways which leverage clean, renewable, and efficient energy to meet societal needs and promote development. Yet such quantitative methods are often critiqued for their reductionary nature, and failure to capture the wider contextual real-world complexities in which energy decisions are made. Integrating qualitative considerations into energy modelling offers an opportunity to reflect these complexities and strengthen techno-economic research, particularly when these considerations can be structurally integrated into models themselves. By developing a framework for endogenous qualitative integration into energy transition modelling for development – through extensive stakeholder co-production, qualitative storylines, and contextual analysis – this paper outlines feasible steps for qualitative incorporation at all phases of the modelling research process. Supported by the results of a systematic literature review, it recommends that qualitative considerations, such as social dynamics, human behaviour and institutional factors - alongside a particular focus on gender and social inclusion, resilience and climate adaptation awareness - be examined and integrated at all stages of the modelling research process, conceptualised into four phases: (1) ‘Pre-Modelling’, (2) ‘Storytelling and Narratives’, (3) ‘The Model’, and (4) ‘Beyond the Model’. • Addresses the unique needs of energy modelling research within low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). • A framework for qualitative integration into all stages of the energy modelling research to aid development is outlined. • A framework for endogenous qualitative integration into energy transition model structures is developed. • Using this framework energy modelling results can be more inclusive, meaningful, and realistic.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 220
Loughborough University (GB), Strathmore University (KE), University of Zambia (ZM), University of Oxford (GB), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Science Oxford (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.