Use of deep learning-based NLP models for full-text data elements extraction for systematic literature review tasks

Systematic literature review (SLR) is an important tool for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) evidence synthesis. SLRs involve the identification and selection of pertinent publications and extraction of relevant data elements from full-text articles, which can be a manually intensive procedure. Previously we developed machine learning models to automatically identify relevant publications based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study investigates the feasibility of applying Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches to automatically extract data elements from the relevant scientific literature. First, 239 full-text articles were collected and annotated for 12 important variables including study cohort, lab technique, and disease type, for proper SLR summary of Human papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence, Pneumococcal Epidemiology, and Pneumococcal Economic Burden. The three resulting annotated corpora are shared publicly at [ https://github.com/Merck/NLP-SLR-corpora ], to provide training data and a benchmark baseline for the NLP community to further research this challenging task. We then compared three classic Named Entity Recognition (NER) algorithms, namely Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models, to assess performance on the data element extraction task. The annotation corpora contain 4,498, 579, and 252 annotated entity mentions for HPV Prevalence, Pneumococcal Epidemiology, and Pneumococcal Economic Burden tasks respectively. Deep learning algorithms achieved superior performance in recognizing the targeted SLR data elements, compared to conventional machine learning algorithms. LSTM models have achieved 0.890, 0.646 and 0.615 micro-averaged F1 scores for three tasks respectively. CRF models could not provide comparable performance on most of the elements of interest. Although BERT-based models are known to generally achieve superior performance on many NLP tasks, we did not observe improvement in our three tasks. Deep learning algorithms have achieved superior performance compared with machine learning models on multiple SLR data element extraction tasks. LSTM model, in particular, is more preferable for deployment in supporting HEOR SLR data element extraction, due to its better performance, generalizability, and scalability as it's cost-effective in our SLR benchmark datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-06-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03979-5
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of deep learning-based NLP models for full-text data elements extraction for systematic literature review tasks

Yeran Li, Liang‐Chin Huang, Frank J. Manion, Lixia Yao et al.
Scientific Reports
Topic Modeling
article

Use of deep learning-based NLP models for full-text data elements extraction for systematic literature review tasks

Yeran Li, Liang‐Chin Huang, Frank J. Manion, Lixia Yao, Nicole Cossrow, Jingcheng Du, Dong Wang, Jingqi Wang, Long He, Bin Lin
article en

Abstract

Systematic literature review (SLR) is an important tool for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (HEOR) evidence synthesis. SLRs involve the identification and selection of pertinent publications and extraction of relevant data elements from full-text articles, which can be a manually intensive procedure. Previously we developed machine learning models to automatically identify relevant publications based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study investigates the feasibility of applying Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches to automatically extract data elements from the relevant scientific literature. First, 239 full-text articles were collected and annotated for 12 important variables including study cohort, lab technique, and disease type, for proper SLR summary of Human papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence, Pneumococcal Epidemiology, and Pneumococcal Economic Burden. The three resulting annotated corpora are shared publicly at [ https://github.com/Merck/NLP-SLR-corpora ], to provide training data and a benchmark baseline for the NLP community to further research this challenging task. We then compared three classic Named Entity Recognition (NER) algorithms, namely Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) models, to assess performance on the data element extraction task. The annotation corpora contain 4,498, 579, and 252 annotated entity mentions for HPV Prevalence, Pneumococcal Epidemiology, and Pneumococcal Economic Burden tasks respectively. Deep learning algorithms achieved superior performance in recognizing the targeted SLR data elements, compared to conventional machine learning algorithms. LSTM models have achieved 0.890, 0.646 and 0.615 micro-averaged F1 scores for three tasks respectively. CRF models could not provide comparable performance on most of the elements of interest. Although BERT-based models are known to generally achieve superior performance on many NLP tasks, we did not observe improvement in our three tasks. Deep learning algorithms have achieved superior performance compared with machine learning models on multiple SLR data element extraction tasks. LSTM model, in particular, is more preferable for deployment in supporting HEOR SLR data element extraction, due to its better performance, generalizability, and scalability as it's cost-effective in our SLR benchmark datasets.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US), Intelligent Medical Objects (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.