Exploring Pre-Service Teachers' Engagement with Generative AI for Multiple-Choice Question Generation

This study aims to delve into the process and perceptions of pre-service teachers as they engage in generating multiple-choice questions with the assistance of generative AI tools. Adopting a single-case study design, the research involved the participation of 35 pre-service teachers. The participants were tasked with utilizing generative AI tools to create multiple-choice questions and evaluate the generated items. Following this, a four-hour training session on item writing was provided to the participants. Post-training, they were asked to reassess the AI-generated products. The final phase involved collecting their reflective thoughts on this experience in writing. The qualitative data gathered were subjected to thematic analysis. A comparative examination of the participants’ evaluations indicated a shift towards more detailed assessments that adhered more closely to measurement and evaluation standards. Reflective insights highlighted their positive perceptions of generative AI.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology in Education and Science
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.624
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Pre-Service Teachers' Engagement with Generative AI for Multiple-Choice Question Generation

Kübra KARAKAYA ÖZYER
1 citations
International Journal of Technology in Education and Science
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
2.48
article

Exploring Pre-Service Teachers' Engagement with Generative AI for Multiple-Choice Question Generation

Kübra KARAKAYA ÖZYER
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to delve into the process and perceptions of pre-service teachers as they engage in generating multiple-choice questions with the assistance of generative AI tools. Adopting a single-case study design, the research involved the participation of 35 pre-service teachers. The participants were tasked with utilizing generative AI tools to create multiple-choice questions and evaluate the generated items. Following this, a four-hour training session on item writing was provided to the participants. Post-training, they were asked to reassess the AI-generated products. The final phase involved collecting their reflective thoughts on this experience in writing. The qualitative data gathered were subjected to thematic analysis. A comparative examination of the participants’ evaluations indicated a shift towards more detailed assessments that adhered more closely to measurement and evaluation standards. Reflective insights highlighted their positive perceptions of generative AI.

International Journal of Technology in Education and ScienceVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.