Studies on contemporary China in Indonesia: A snapshot of the current knowledge landscape

This article examines the development of contemporary China Studies in Indonesia, a key site in the Global South where interest in China has grown alongside its global rise. We trace the field’s evolution from Cold War-era restrictions to its current focus on policy and state-centric analyses, often shaped by international relations frameworks. Despite increased research activity, the field remains fragmented, constrained by limited Chinese-language capacity and reliance on Western paradigms. Indonesian scholars have contributed valuable insights into China’s impact on Indonesia, yet their work rarely engages directly with Chinese sources or scholars. We argue for deeper regional collaboration, greater use of Chinese-language materials, and analytical approaches that move beyond Western-centric models to enrich both local and global understandings of contemporary China.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Melbourne Asia Review
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37839/mar2652-550x22.14
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studies on contemporary China in Indonesia: A snapshot of the current knowledge landscape

Tao Yu
Melbourne Asia Review
Asian Studies and History
article

Studies on contemporary China in Indonesia: A snapshot of the current knowledge landscape

Tao Yu
article en

Abstract

This article examines the development of contemporary China Studies in Indonesia, a key site in the Global South where interest in China has grown alongside its global rise. We trace the field’s evolution from Cold War-era restrictions to its current focus on policy and state-centric analyses, often shaped by international relations frameworks. Despite increased research activity, the field remains fragmented, constrained by limited Chinese-language capacity and reliance on Western paradigms. Indonesian scholars have contributed valuable insights into China’s impact on Indonesia, yet their work rarely engages directly with Chinese sources or scholars. We argue for deeper regional collaboration, greater use of Chinese-language materials, and analytical approaches that move beyond Western-centric models to enrich both local and global understandings of contemporary China.

Melbourne Asia ReviewVol. 22
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.