U-Net-Based Approaches for Biometric Identification and Recognition in Cattle

Biometric identification in animals, which provides unique identification/recognition of animals by utilizing their physical characteristics, has become an important tool in modern agriculture and livestock sectors [1] .These methods include fingerprint recognition, facial recognition [2] , retina scanning [3][4][5] , nose prints [6] , body patterns [7] , and DNA profiling [8] .These methods give each animal a unique identifier, facilitating easy detection in cases of loss or theft.Biometric identification in animals offers significant benefits not only in cases of loss but also in areas such as health monitoring, reproduction control, and feed consumption tracking [9] .One of the main advantages of biometric identification is that it does not negatively impact animal welfare.Traditional methods have been used for animal identification and recognition up until now.These traditional methods include ear notching, ear tattoos, branding, freeze marking, and ear tagging [10] .Traditional methods can cause stress in animals, increase the risk of infection, and even subject them to physically traumatic procedures.Ear tagging is still widely used for animal identification and recognition [11] .This method involves attaching unique numbered tags to the animals' ears.However, ear tagging has numerous disadvantages.For instance, the process can cause infections or irritation in the animals' ears.Animals may experience stress, negatively affecting their production efficiency.If the animal moves its head during tagging or an issue arises, it can result in can result in torn ears.Additionally, animals can snag their tags on fences or other objects, leading to ear injuries.Moreover, the ear tagging method has environmental drawbacks.Tags frequently fall off, contributing to plastic waste and environmental pollution.The loss of tags necessitates re-

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2025.34130
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

U-Net-Based Approaches for Biometric Identification and Recognition in Cattle

Celal Şahin Ermutlu, Alican Yılmaz, Ahmet Saygılı, Nihat Eren Özmen et al.
2 citations
Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi
Food Supply Chain Traceability
2.32
article

U-Net-Based Approaches for Biometric Identification and Recognition in Cattle

Celal Şahin Ermutlu, Alican Yılmaz, Ahmet Saygılı, Nihat Eren Özmen, Pınar Cihan, Özgür Aksoy, Uğur Aydın, Muhammed Akyüzlü
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Biometric identification in animals, which provides unique identification/recognition of animals by utilizing their physical characteristics, has become an important tool in modern agriculture and livestock sectors [1] .These methods include fingerprint recognition, facial recognition [2] , retina scanning [3][4][5] , nose prints [6] , body patterns [7] , and DNA profiling [8] .These methods give each animal a unique identifier, facilitating easy detection in cases of loss or theft.Biometric identification in animals offers significant benefits not only in cases of loss but also in areas such as health monitoring, reproduction control, and feed consumption tracking [9] .One of the main advantages of biometric identification is that it does not negatively impact animal welfare.Traditional methods have been used for animal identification and recognition up until now.These traditional methods include ear notching, ear tattoos, branding, freeze marking, and ear tagging [10] .Traditional methods can cause stress in animals, increase the risk of infection, and even subject them to physically traumatic procedures.Ear tagging is still widely used for animal identification and recognition [11] .This method involves attaching unique numbered tags to the animals' ears.However, ear tagging has numerous disadvantages.For instance, the process can cause infections or irritation in the animals' ears.Animals may experience stress, negatively affecting their production efficiency.If the animal moves its head during tagging or an issue arises, it can result in can result in torn ears.Additionally, animals can snag their tags on fences or other objects, leading to ear injuries.Moreover, the ear tagging method has environmental drawbacks.Tags frequently fall off, contributing to plastic waste and environmental pollution.The loss of tags necessitates re-

Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu, Kafkas Üniversitesi
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.