Treating Cancer Cachexia Should be Essential in Cancer Care

Cancer cachexia manifests as a multifaceted syndrome characterized by weight loss, appetite loss, muscle wasting, fatigue, weakness, and systemic disturbances, affecting patients’ physical function quality of life (QoL). Despite these negative effects, treatments have often been limited to supportive care with primary objective of symptom relief. This review aims to advocate for a reassessment of the clinical significance of effective therapies for cancer cachexia, positioning it as ‘essential’ care directed at the root cause of cachexia rather than ‘supportive’ care only. Essential care encompasses routine screening for cachexia using criteria such as the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) or the Cachexia Score (CASCO), and therapeutic approaches that identify and inhibit mechanisms that are driving cachexia. Managing this multifactorial syndrome has involved a multimodal approach that has included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nutritional support, physical activity, appetite-stimulating agents, and specific androgen receptor modulators. These approaches have not been successful. Instead, identifying drugs and biologics that are immunomodulators targeting the molecular and cellular immune dysfunction promoting cachexia is a strategy that could reduce symptoms and improve outcomes in cachectic cancer patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26502/acbr.50170445
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treating Cancer Cachexia Should be Essential in Cancer Care

Philip Bonomi, Lingbing Zhang
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Treating Cancer Cachexia Should be Essential in Cancer Care

Philip Bonomi, Lingbing Zhang
article en

Abstract

Cancer cachexia manifests as a multifaceted syndrome characterized by weight loss, appetite loss, muscle wasting, fatigue, weakness, and systemic disturbances, affecting patients’ physical function quality of life (QoL). Despite these negative effects, treatments have often been limited to supportive care with primary objective of symptom relief. This review aims to advocate for a reassessment of the clinical significance of effective therapies for cancer cachexia, positioning it as ‘essential’ care directed at the root cause of cachexia rather than ‘supportive’ care only. Essential care encompasses routine screening for cachexia using criteria such as the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) or the Cachexia Score (CASCO), and therapeutic approaches that identify and inhibit mechanisms that are driving cachexia. Managing this multifactorial syndrome has involved a multimodal approach that has included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nutritional support, physical activity, appetite-stimulating agents, and specific androgen receptor modulators. These approaches have not been successful. Instead, identifying drugs and biologics that are immunomodulators targeting the molecular and cellular immune dysfunction promoting cachexia is a strategy that could reduce symptoms and improve outcomes in cachectic cancer patients.

Archives of Clinical and Biomedical ResearchVol. 9(2)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.