TINJAUAN PENERAPAN CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) DAN PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE (PERT) DALAM PEMBANGUNAN PROYEK GEDUNG

Infrastructure serves as a fundamental public service provided by the government to meet community needs, with its development significantly impacting societal welfare. Project delays and instability often result from inadequate planning. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of applying the Critical Path Method (CPM) and the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in determining the construction duration of the Building X project. Both methods are project management tools designed to improve time efficiency in construction activities. Calculations were performed using data provided by field personnel. While CPM utilizes a single time estimate, PERT incorporates three-time estimates to account for variability. The outputs of this study include the total duration required to complete the project and the identification of its critical path. Based on the analysis, the CPM method estimated a project duration of 37 weeks, whereas the PERT method estimated 38 weeks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Material Journal
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v7i1.6562
Primary Topic
Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TINJAUAN PENERAPAN CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) DAN PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE (PERT) DALAM PEMBANGUNAN PROYEK GEDUNG

Muhammad Bagus Yulistian, Rena Avinika Ningtyas, Muhammad Rijali Sukur Pelu, Okri Asfino Putra et al.
Construction and Material Journal
Geotechnical and construction materials studies
article

TINJAUAN PENERAPAN CRITICAL PATH METHOD (CPM) DAN PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE (PERT) DALAM PEMBANGUNAN PROYEK GEDUNG

Muhammad Bagus Yulistian, Rena Avinika Ningtyas, Muhammad Rijali Sukur Pelu, Okri Asfino Putra, Oktavianus Pranoto, Rakyan Choiruna Daffarel, Yuliza Putri Rahmayeni
article en

Abstract

Infrastructure serves as a fundamental public service provided by the government to meet community needs, with its development significantly impacting societal welfare. Project delays and instability often result from inadequate planning. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of applying the Critical Path Method (CPM) and the Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in determining the construction duration of the Building X project. Both methods are project management tools designed to improve time efficiency in construction activities. Calculations were performed using data provided by field personnel. While CPM utilizes a single time estimate, PERT incorporates three-time estimates to account for variability. The outputs of this study include the total duration required to complete the project and the identification of its critical path. Based on the analysis, the CPM method estimated a project duration of 37 weeks, whereas the PERT method estimated 38 weeks.

Construction and Material JournalVol. 7(1)
Indonesia Defense University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Geotechnical and construction materials studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.