Collective Sensemaking: A Cultural-Sociological and Psychological Study of Occupational Risk

This work explores how individuals in risks groups use multiple approaches to understand their risks, integrating cultural-sociological and psychological views. Workers’ interpretations, actions and reactions to unpredictable risks are just as important in defining occupational risk as the hazards they encounter. To understand the effect of collective meanings on risk perception and decisions, this study makes use of case studies, insights from anthropology and psychological theory. It shows how different cultural norms, workplace rules, emotions and identity are involved in defining what risks mean and in how they are coped with in various careers, including both hazardous occupations and desk jobs. It concludes that, to be successful, risk management should take into account these kinds of interpretations, rather than stop at specialist assessments of risks. Such an approach helps us see how workplace risks are shaped, managed and sometimes modified by groups of people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of arts, humanities and social science.
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i2.631
Primary Topic
Social Representations and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective Sensemaking: A Cultural-Sociological and Psychological Study of Occupational Risk

Kimberly Long Holt
1 links
Journal of arts, humanities and social science.
Social Representations and Identity
article

Collective Sensemaking: A Cultural-Sociological and Psychological Study of Occupational Risk

Kimberly Long Holt
article en

Abstract

This work explores how individuals in risks groups use multiple approaches to understand their risks, integrating cultural-sociological and psychological views. Workers’ interpretations, actions and reactions to unpredictable risks are just as important in defining occupational risk as the hazards they encounter. To understand the effect of collective meanings on risk perception and decisions, this study makes use of case studies, insights from anthropology and psychological theory. It shows how different cultural norms, workplace rules, emotions and identity are involved in defining what risks mean and in how they are coped with in various careers, including both hazardous occupations and desk jobs. It concludes that, to be successful, risk management should take into account these kinds of interpretations, rather than stop at specialist assessments of risks. Such an approach helps us see how workplace risks are shaped, managed and sometimes modified by groups of people.

Journal of arts, humanities and social science.Vol. 2(2)
Occupational Safety & Health Administration (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Social Representations and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collective Sensemaking: A Cultural-Sociological and Psychological Study of Occupational Risk — Kimberly Long Holt · Journal of arts, humanities and social science. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS