Family Ties, Social Control, and Authoritarian Distribution to Elites

Abstract Authoritarian survival theories maintain that dictators distribute rents to elites who can control the masses. Yet, it is unclear how dictators choose beneficiary elites. We argue that elites centrally placed in their locality’s family network enjoy greater influence on other community members and, thus, are more likely to be co-opted through distribution. We test this argument by compiling a novel dataset of Paraguayan family networks that we link to families who illegally benefited from public land grants from 1954 to 2007. Using a difference-in-differences in reverse design, we find that local families with higher network centrality were more likely to receive these grants during the 1954–88 dictatorship. We also show more affiliations with the ruling Colorado Party and incidents of repression—indicators of social control—in localities with more central families before 1989. Our work shows that family ties can serve to build authoritarian ruling coalitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055425000231
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family Ties, Social Control, and Authoritarian Distribution to Elites

Antonella Bandiera, Jorge Mangonnet, Horacio Larreguy
1 citations
American Political Science Review
Political Conflict and Governance
4.20
article

Family Ties, Social Control, and Authoritarian Distribution to Elites

Antonella Bandiera, Jorge Mangonnet, Horacio Larreguy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Authoritarian survival theories maintain that dictators distribute rents to elites who can control the masses. Yet, it is unclear how dictators choose beneficiary elites. We argue that elites centrally placed in their locality’s family network enjoy greater influence on other community members and, thus, are more likely to be co-opted through distribution. We test this argument by compiling a novel dataset of Paraguayan family networks that we link to families who illegally benefited from public land grants from 1954 to 2007. Using a difference-in-differences in reverse design, we find that local families with higher network centrality were more likely to receive these grants during the 1954–88 dictatorship. We also show more affiliations with the ruling Colorado Party and incidents of repression—indicators of social control—in localities with more central families before 1989. Our work shows that family ties can serve to build authoritarian ruling coalitions.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 120(1)
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (MX), Vanderbilt University (US)
University of Oxford, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Universitat de Barcelona, Universidad del Rosario, Nuffield College, University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Political Conflict and Governance
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.