Real-Time MR-Guided Lumbosacral Periradicular Injection Therapy Using a 0.55 T MRI System: A Phantom Study

<b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided periradicular nerve root injection therapy (PRT) using a 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with fast dynamic imaging in a phantom. <b>Methods:</b> Five radiologists with varying levels of experience in PRT performed nine randomly assigned PRT procedures: three under MR guidance, three under CT guidance using a fully integrated laser navigation system, and three under conventional CT guidance, all on a specialized phantom of the lumbar spine. The PRTs were assessed by two experienced neuroradiologists with expertise in interventions, using a scale of 1-5, as follows: 5 = excellent to very good, 4 = good, 3 = satisfactory 2 = bad, 1 = very bad. The puncture time and total intervention time were noted. <b>Results:</b> All procedures were technically successful. The subjective evaluation of the PRTs showed similar results with a median of 5 for all three guidance systems. Additionally, there was no significant difference with respect to pure puncture time (the period after needle path determination) among all PRTs (Mean ± SD): MR-guided 178 ± 117 s, CT-guided with laser system 186 ± 73 s, and the conventional CT-guided 218 ± 91 s (<i>p</i> = 0.482). However, the total procedure time including planning images was significantly higher for MR-guided PRT (700 ± 182 s) compared to CT guidance with laser system (366 ± 85 s) and conventional CT guidance (358 ± 150 s; <i>p</i> = 0.012). <b>Conclusions:</b> Real-time MRI-guided lumbosacral periradicular injection therapy utilizing a 0.55 T MRI system is feasible with similar puncture times to CT guidance but consumes more intervention time due to the duration of planning sequences. Limitation: The study utilized a stationary phantom made of homogeneous material, which provides an incomplete representation of real tissue properties and motion complexity applied to human beings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111413
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-Time MR-Guided Lumbosacral Periradicular Injection Therapy Using a 0.55 T MRI System: A Phantom Study

Christoph Moenninghoff, Saher Saeed, Denise Schoenbeck, Jan Borggrefe et al.
Diagnostics
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Real-Time MR-Guided Lumbosacral Periradicular Injection Therapy Using a 0.55 T MRI System: A Phantom Study

Christoph Moenninghoff, Saher Saeed, Denise Schoenbeck, Jan Borggrefe, Jan Boriesosdick, Nina Pauline Haag, Julian Schreck, Arwed Elias Michael, Matthias Michael Woeltjen, Julius Henning Niehoff, Jan Robert Kröger
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided periradicular nerve root injection therapy (PRT) using a 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with fast dynamic imaging in a phantom. <b>Methods:</b> Five radiologists with varying levels of experience in PRT performed nine randomly assigned PRT procedures: three under MR guidance, three under CT guidance using a fully integrated laser navigation system, and three under conventional CT guidance, all on a specialized phantom of the lumbar spine. The PRTs were assessed by two experienced neuroradiologists with expertise in interventions, using a scale of 1-5, as follows: 5 = excellent to very good, 4 = good, 3 = satisfactory 2 = bad, 1 = very bad. The puncture time and total intervention time were noted. <b>Results:</b> All procedures were technically successful. The subjective evaluation of the PRTs showed similar results with a median of 5 for all three guidance systems. Additionally, there was no significant difference with respect to pure puncture time (the period after needle path determination) among all PRTs (Mean ± SD): MR-guided 178 ± 117 s, CT-guided with laser system 186 ± 73 s, and the conventional CT-guided 218 ± 91 s (<i>p</i> = 0.482). However, the total procedure time including planning images was significantly higher for MR-guided PRT (700 ± 182 s) compared to CT guidance with laser system (366 ± 85 s) and conventional CT guidance (358 ± 150 s; <i>p</i> = 0.012). <b>Conclusions:</b> Real-time MRI-guided lumbosacral periradicular injection therapy utilizing a 0.55 T MRI system is feasible with similar puncture times to CT guidance but consumes more intervention time due to the duration of planning sequences. Limitation: The study utilized a stationary phantom made of homogeneous material, which provides an incomplete representation of real tissue properties and motion complexity applied to human beings.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(11)
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.