Real-Time MR-Guided Lumbosacral Periradicular Injection Therapy Using a 0.55 T MRI System: A Phantom Study
<b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided periradicular nerve root injection therapy (PRT) using a 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with fast dynamic imaging in a phantom. <b>Methods:</b> Five radiologists with varying levels of experience in PRT performed nine randomly assigned PRT procedures: three under MR guidance, three under CT guidance using a fully integrated laser navigation system, and three under conventional CT guidance, all on a specialized phantom of the lumbar spine. The PRTs were assessed by two experienced neuroradiologists with expertise in interventions, using a scale of 1-5, as follows: 5 = excellent to very good, 4 = good, 3 = satisfactory 2 = bad, 1 = very bad. The puncture time and total intervention time were noted. <b>Results:</b> All procedures were technically successful. The subjective evaluation of the PRTs showed similar results with a median of 5 for all three guidance systems. Additionally, there was no significant difference with respect to pure puncture time (the period after needle path determination) among all PRTs (Mean ± SD): MR-guided 178 ± 117 s, CT-guided with laser system 186 ± 73 s, and the conventional CT-guided 218 ± 91 s (<i>p</i> = 0.482). However, the total procedure time including planning images was significantly higher for MR-guided PRT (700 ± 182 s) compared to CT guidance with laser system (366 ± 85 s) and conventional CT guidance (358 ± 150 s; <i>p</i> = 0.012). <b>Conclusions:</b> Real-time MRI-guided lumbosacral periradicular injection therapy utilizing a 0.55 T MRI system is feasible with similar puncture times to CT guidance but consumes more intervention time due to the duration of planning sequences. Limitation: The study utilized a stationary phantom made of homogeneous material, which provides an incomplete representation of real tissue properties and motion complexity applied to human beings.
Authors
- Christoph Moenninghoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-9386)
- Saher Saeed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9360-3131)
- Denise Schoenbeck
- Jan Borggrefe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2908-7560)
- Jan Boriesosdick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5227-8803)
- Nina Pauline Haag (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-1295)
- Julian Schreck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-4324)
- Arwed Elias Michael (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-8088)
- Matthias Michael Woeltjen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7624-5109)
- Julius Henning Niehoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0103-3819)
- Jan Robert Kröger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1218-7610)
Institutions
- University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostics
- Published
- 2025-06-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111413
- Primary Topic
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00