Endovascular Treatment Versus Hybrid Repair for Iliofemoral Occlusive Disease: A Pilot Prospective Randomized Trial
This study supports that the hybrid treatment has an advantage over EVT in terms of safety and primary patency in the mid-term follow-up period. However, a larger study is needed to confirm these findings and further investigate the long-term effects of the hybrid approach.
Authors
- Pavel Ignatenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-0848)
- O. S. Osipova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7418-3298)
- Vsevolod A. Akulov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1991-6783)
- A. М. Chernyavskiy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-8678)
- A. V. Cheban (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6094-4607)
- Vladimir Starodubtsev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-614X)
- Andrey Karpenko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6101-3313)
- А. А. Гостев (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7806-7868)
- Shoraan B. Saaya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-6948)
- Yann Gouëffic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9246-1503)
Institutions
- Meshalkin National Medical Research Center (RU)
- Federal Medical-Biological Agency (RU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2025-06-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31649
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01