Conceptual design on the field of view of celestial navigation systems for maritime autonomous surface ships

Abstract In order to understand the appropriate field of view (FOV) size of celestial automatic navigation systems for surface ships, we investigate the variations of measurement accuracy of star position and probability of successful star identification with respect to FOV, focusing on the decreasing number of observable star magnitudes and the presence of physically covered stars in marine environments. The results revealed that, although a larger FOV reduces the measurement accuracy of star positions, it increases the number of observable objects and thus improves the probability of star identification using subgraph isomorphism-based methods. It was also found that, although at least four objects need to be observed for accurate identification, four objects may not be sufficient for wider FOVs. On the other hand, from the point of view of celestial navigation systems, a decrease in the measurement accuracy leads to a decrease in positioning accuracy. Therefore, it was found that maximizing the FOV is required for celestial automatic navigation systems as long as the desired positioning accuracy can be ensured. Furthermore, it was found that algorithms incorporating five or more observed stars are required to achieve highly accurate star identification over a wider FOV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-025-01064-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual design on the field of view of celestial navigation systems for maritime autonomous surface ships

Shigehito Shimizu, Youhei Akimoto, Atsuo Maki, Shinji Mitani et al.
1 citations
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
4.99
article

Conceptual design on the field of view of celestial navigation systems for maritime autonomous surface ships

Shigehito Shimizu, Youhei Akimoto, Atsuo Maki, Shinji Mitani, Fuyuki Hane, Kouki Wakita, Takeshi Sekiguchi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In order to understand the appropriate field of view (FOV) size of celestial automatic navigation systems for surface ships, we investigate the variations of measurement accuracy of star position and probability of successful star identification with respect to FOV, focusing on the decreasing number of observable star magnitudes and the presence of physically covered stars in marine environments. The results revealed that, although a larger FOV reduces the measurement accuracy of star positions, it increases the number of observable objects and thus improves the probability of star identification using subgraph isomorphism-based methods. It was also found that, although at least four objects need to be observed for accurate identification, four objects may not be sufficient for wider FOVs. On the other hand, from the point of view of celestial navigation systems, a decrease in the measurement accuracy leads to a decrease in positioning accuracy. Therefore, it was found that maximizing the FOV is required for celestial automatic navigation systems as long as the desired positioning accuracy can be ensured. Furthermore, it was found that algorithms incorporating five or more observed stars are required to achieve highly accurate star identification over a wider FOV.

Journal of Marine Science and TechnologyVol. 30(3)
University of Tsukuba (JP), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP), RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project (JP), Museum of Japanese Art Yamato Bunkakan (JP), Keihin (Japan) (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Inertial Sensor and Navigation
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.