Comparing circular cortical‐lamina anchoring versus split‐crest technique in posterior mandible: A retrospective cohort study

This study compared two methods to widen the bone at the back of the lower jaw: circular cortical-lamina anchoring (CCA) and modified split-crest technique (MSC). We checked 39 patients who underwent these procedures from 2018 to 2023 and measured the width of the bones and the changes in soft tissue after the operations. Initially, the size of the jawbones was similar. After the operations, both groups had wider jawbones and the bones in the CCA group showed more growth (4.25 mm on average) than the bones in the MSC group (2.97 mm on average). The best results were seen at 3 mm below the top of the jawbone. Therefore, both methods can make the jawbone wider, but the CCA method seems to be better suited for growing more bone. The CCA could be a good alternative to the MSC for patients who require widening of their jawbone for implantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Periodontology
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0733
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing circular cortical‐lamina anchoring versus split‐crest technique in posterior mandible: A retrospective cohort study

X. Wang, Rui Bao, Zehong Guo, Chengyu Li et al.
Journal of Periodontology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Comparing circular cortical‐lamina anchoring versus split‐crest technique in posterior mandible: A retrospective cohort study

X. Wang, Rui Bao, Zehong Guo, Chengyu Li, Liqing Yang, Xuan Guan
article en

Abstract

This study compared two methods to widen the bone at the back of the lower jaw: circular cortical-lamina anchoring (CCA) and modified split-crest technique (MSC). We checked 39 patients who underwent these procedures from 2018 to 2023 and measured the width of the bones and the changes in soft tissue after the operations. Initially, the size of the jawbones was similar. After the operations, both groups had wider jawbones and the bones in the CCA group showed more growth (4.25 mm on average) than the bones in the MSC group (2.97 mm on average). The best results were seen at 3 mm below the top of the jawbone. Therefore, both methods can make the jawbone wider, but the CCA method seems to be better suited for growing more bone. The CCA could be a good alternative to the MSC for patients who require widening of their jawbone for implantation.

Journal of Periodontology
Southern Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.