The link between low-stress bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting

Abstract Existing research links standard bicycle lanes with increased levels of bicyclist commuting. Here we question how newer facility types fare relative to standard bicycle lanes. Using 6 years of longitudinal data across 14,011 block groups in 28 US cities, we find that block groups that installed protected bicycle lanes experienced bicycle commuter increases 1.8 times larger than standard bicycle lane block groups, 1.6 times larger than shared-lane marking block groups and 4.3 times larger than block groups that did not install bicycle facilities. Focusing on mileage, protected bicycle lane mileage installed was significantly associated with bicycle commuter increases 52.5% stronger than standard bicycle lane mileage and 281.2% stronger than shared-lane marking mileage. The results suggest that lower-stress bicycle facilities—such as protected bicycle lanes—are significantly associated with larger increases in ridership at the block-group level compared with higher-stress facilities such as standard bicycle lanes and shared-lane markings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Cities
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00255-5
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The link between low-stress bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting

Nicholas N. Ferenchak, Wesley E. Marshall
5 citations
Nature Cities
Urban Transport and Accessibility
10.88
article

The link between low-stress bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting

Nicholas N. Ferenchak, Wesley E. Marshall
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Existing research links standard bicycle lanes with increased levels of bicyclist commuting. Here we question how newer facility types fare relative to standard bicycle lanes. Using 6 years of longitudinal data across 14,011 block groups in 28 US cities, we find that block groups that installed protected bicycle lanes experienced bicycle commuter increases 1.8 times larger than standard bicycle lane block groups, 1.6 times larger than shared-lane marking block groups and 4.3 times larger than block groups that did not install bicycle facilities. Focusing on mileage, protected bicycle lane mileage installed was significantly associated with bicycle commuter increases 52.5% stronger than standard bicycle lane mileage and 281.2% stronger than shared-lane marking mileage. The results suggest that lower-stress bicycle facilities—such as protected bicycle lanes—are significantly associated with larger increases in ridership at the block-group level compared with higher-stress facilities such as standard bicycle lanes and shared-lane markings.

Nature CitiesVol. 2(6)
University of Denver (US), University of New Mexico (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
U.S. Department of Transportation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
10.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The link between low-stress bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting — Nicholas N. Ferenchak, Wesley E. Marshall · Nature Cities (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS