Development and Managerial Decision-Making in an Architectural and Construction Company Based on the «Six Thinking Hats» Method

The article explores the implementation of Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” method in the managerial practice of architectural and construction companies, which enables a significant improvement in the decision-making process. The authors analyse the relevance of this approach in the context of the modern architectural and construction industry, which faces numerous challenges such as legislative changes, fluctuations in material prices, intense competition, and technological innovations. The “Six Thinking Hats” method provides a multifaceted approach to situation analysis, allowing managers to consider problems from different perspectives: facts, emotions, logic, creativity, and process-oriented thinking. This promotes the adoption of more balanced and effective decisions that take into account various aspects of projects, including financial, environmental, and social dimensions. The article details the role of each “hat”: the white hat focuses on collecting objective data; the yellow highlights potential benefits; the black identifies risks and drawbacks; the red addresses emotions and intuition; the green stimulates creativity; and the blue organizes the thinking process. Such a structured approach helps prevent conflicts and fosters constructive team discussions. The authors emphasize that the application of the “Six Thinking Hats” method enhances employee motivation, as each team member feels that their opinion matters. In turn, this fosters team spirit and innovation, as participants have more opportunities to express their ideas and suggestions. The article also presents practical recommendations for implementing the method in architectural and construction companies. These include conducting training sessions for staff, forming working groups, applying the method regularly in decision-making processes, and evaluating its effectiveness. Particular attention is given to creating a favourable organizational culture that supports the active participation of all team members in the management process. Overall, the authors conclude that Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” method has considerable potential to enhance the effectiveness of management activities in architectural and construction companies. Its systemic approach, focused on addressing diverse aspects and stimulating creative thinking, can become a key success factor in today’s dynamic market environment. Implementing this method can contribute to increasing a company’s competitiveness, promoting innovation, and strengthening its position both nationally and internationally.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Business Inform
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-3-391-404
Primary Topic
Construction Management and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Managerial Decision-Making in an Architectural and Construction Company Based on the «Six Thinking Hats» Method

Ruslan KUBANOV, Dmytro Makatora, Ivan M. Kopchuk
Business Inform
Construction Management and Sustainability
article

Development and Managerial Decision-Making in an Architectural and Construction Company Based on the «Six Thinking Hats» Method

Ruslan KUBANOV, Dmytro Makatora, Ivan M. Kopchuk
article en

Abstract

The article explores the implementation of Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” method in the managerial practice of architectural and construction companies, which enables a significant improvement in the decision-making process. The authors analyse the relevance of this approach in the context of the modern architectural and construction industry, which faces numerous challenges such as legislative changes, fluctuations in material prices, intense competition, and technological innovations. The “Six Thinking Hats” method provides a multifaceted approach to situation analysis, allowing managers to consider problems from different perspectives: facts, emotions, logic, creativity, and process-oriented thinking. This promotes the adoption of more balanced and effective decisions that take into account various aspects of projects, including financial, environmental, and social dimensions. The article details the role of each “hat”: the white hat focuses on collecting objective data; the yellow highlights potential benefits; the black identifies risks and drawbacks; the red addresses emotions and intuition; the green stimulates creativity; and the blue organizes the thinking process. Such a structured approach helps prevent conflicts and fosters constructive team discussions. The authors emphasize that the application of the “Six Thinking Hats” method enhances employee motivation, as each team member feels that their opinion matters. In turn, this fosters team spirit and innovation, as participants have more opportunities to express their ideas and suggestions. The article also presents practical recommendations for implementing the method in architectural and construction companies. These include conducting training sessions for staff, forming working groups, applying the method regularly in decision-making processes, and evaluating its effectiveness. Particular attention is given to creating a favourable organizational culture that supports the active participation of all team members in the management process. Overall, the authors conclude that Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” method has considerable potential to enhance the effectiveness of management activities in architectural and construction companies. Its systemic approach, focused on addressing diverse aspects and stimulating creative thinking, can become a key success factor in today’s dynamic market environment. Implementing this method can contribute to increasing a company’s competitiveness, promoting innovation, and strengthening its position both nationally and internationally.

Business InformVol. 3(566)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Construction Management and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.